
Brent Council decided 924 householder applications in 2025-26 and granted 790 of them, an approval rate of 85.5%, almost level with the 85.6% London figure. The same year it refused 79 of the 243 large rear extensions put through prior approval, 32.5%. The council adopted its Local Plan 2019-2041 in February 2022 and its Residential Extensions and Alterations SPD on 16 January 2025, so advice written before either date needs checking.
Photo: David Howard, CC BY-SA 2.0
Brent decides householder cases quickly and approves about as many as the London average. The large rear extension prior approval route is where its record stands out, and its appeal record sits close to the London figure.
| Measure | Brent | London | England |
|---|---|---|---|
| Householder applications decided, 2025-26 | 924 | 24,758 | 151,867 |
| Householder approval rate | 85.5% | 85.6% | 90.3% |
| Decided within 8 weeks (standard cases) | 97.5% | — | — |
| Large extension prior approvals decided | 243 | — | — |
| Large extension prior approvals refused | 32.5% | — | — |
| Householder appeals allowed, five years | 38.2% | 39.9% | 34.4% |
Approval, speed and prior approvals: MHCLG district planning application statistics (PS1/PS2), financial year 2025-26. The eight-week figure is 673 of 690 decisions excluding planning performance agreements and extensions of time. Appeals: Planning Inspectorate casework, five years to 30 June 2026, 71 of 186 determined householder appeals allowed. Derived in scripts/aggregate/.
Brent refused 134 of its 924 householder applications. Its 85.5% approval rate ranks 17th of the 32 boroughs with a published figure, and it is 4.8 points below England's 90.3%. On speed it does better: 673 of 690 standard decisions came within eight weeks, 97.5%, 4th of 32. A further 234 decisions ran under a planning performance agreement or an agreed extension of time, 225 of them in time, and the eight-week measure leaves those out.
Large home extensions under prior approval tell a different story. The national rules let a single-storey rear extension reach 6m on an attached house or 8m on a detached one, if the house is not on article 2(3) land (conservation areas are article 2(3) land) and the council gives prior approval. Brent decided 243 and refused 79. The statistics give no reasons, so the figure is a warning that a 6m extension is not a formality here, not a verdict on any one scheme. Prior approval can also be refused for breaching the Class A limits or for too little information (GPDO A.4(3)).
The council's own Residential Extensions and Alterations SPD, paragraph 1.1.5, says that where prior approval is required the council will seek to apply the SPD's guidance. Its single-storey rear extension section sets depths of 6m (attached) and 8m (detached) but also says depth must not be more than half the length of the garden, and that there must be acceptable daylight to habitable rooms and no significant harm to neighbours' outlook or amenity space (paragraphs 3.1.4, 3.1.11 and 3.1.12). We have not seen the refusal notices, so we cannot say which of these tests decided the 79 refusals.
On appeal, the Planning Inspectorate allowed 71 of 186 householder appeals against Brent over five years, 38.2%, 15th of 32 and 3.8 points above the national rate of 34.4%.

The council's Local Plan page names the Brent Local Plan 2019-2041 as the adopted plan and says the council formally adopted a new Local Plan in February 2022; the plan's own cover reads Adopted February 2022. Paragraph 2.4 of the plan lists the documents it replaced and revoked: the 2010 Core Strategy, the 2011 Site Specific Allocations Document, the 2015 Wembley Area Action Plan and the 2016 Development Management Policies Plan. The policies that matter for a home are DMP1 (development management general policy), BD3 (basements), BH12 (residential outbuildings), BH13 (residential amenity space) and BHC1 (heritage assets). A separate page covers an emerging plan: the council published its notice of intention to start on 30 June 2026 and ran a scoping consultation from 2 to 30 September 2026, now closed; the call for sites is open until 31 December 2026. Its timetable file targets a content and evidence consultation in July 2027, a proposed plan consultation in May 2028, submission in November 2028 and adoption in April 2029. Those are targets, and the 2022 plan, with the London Plan, stays the policy base until a new one is adopted. In the part of Brent run by the Old Oak and Park Royal Development Corporation (most land south of the North Circular and West Coast Main Line, such as Park Royal), OPDC is the planning authority and its own documents apply.
The SPD was adopted on 16 January 2025 after an eight-week consultation from 3 October to 28 November 2024. It supports Local Plan policy DMP1 and is a material consideration where planning permission is needed. Its figures are guidance for applications, and permitted development has its own limits.
| Subject | What the SPD says | What to take from it |
|---|---|---|
| Single-storey rear extension (3.1) | Up to the full width of the original home; up to 6m deep for attached homes and 8m for detached homes; depth not more than half the garden length; 4m high with eaves no more than 3m (up to 3m or 4m deep) or 2.5m on the boundary (deeper) | The depths match the prior approval limits, so the garden-length, daylight and outlook tests carry the weight |
| Two-storey rear extension (3.2) | Not more than 3m deep for attached homes and 4m for detached; must not cross the 45 degree line from the middle of the nearest habitable room window on the original rear wall of a neighbour | Much shallower than the single-storey limit |
| Single-storey side extension (3.3) | Not more than two thirds of the width of the original home; up to 4m high with eaves no more than 3m | A side extension past the original rear wall is also judged as a rear extension |
| Two-storey side extension (3.4) | Not more than two thirds of the width; first floor and roof set back at least 0.5m from the original front wall; no flat roof unless it matches the original | Roof shape follows the original house |
| Outrigger extension (3.5) | Not more than 3m from the end wall of the outrigger and 3.5m high, eaves no more than 2.5m on the boundary; extensions creating inner rooms should include a lightwell at least 2m deep, or otherwise keep daylight, outlook and ventilation to the affected rooms | The usual side-return case on a Victorian terrace |
| Rear and side dormers (3.6) | Rear dormers up to the full roof width and set up at least 0.2m from the original eaves; side dormers also set up at least 0.2m and obscure glazed to 1.7m; no dormer higher than the original ridge | Front dormers only where they are a common feature of the street |
| Outbuildings (3.11) | Where permission is needed, up to 20 square metres on a garden under 100 square metres and up to 30 square metres on a larger garden; 2.5m high within 2m of the boundary | A condition keeps outbuildings incidental to the house |
Source: London Borough of Brent, Residential Extensions and Alterations Supplementary Planning Document, January 2025, read from the council PDF on 14 October 2026. Paragraph 1.5.3 says the guidance is not intended for properties in conservation areas or listed buildings. The permitted development limits of 3m or 4m (6m or 8m with prior approval) come from Class A of Part 1 of the General Permitted Development Order as amended; our guide to rear extension limits sets out the exceptions.
The council's heritage page says there are 22 conservation areas. It lists 23 headings, but one, Sudbury Cottages, is marked de-designated on 28 May 2024, leaving 22, including Kensal Rise, designated that day. The Local Plan (2022) also says 22, about 7% of the borough, before those changes. The national register in our dataset (15 August 2026) records 23, which we have not reconciled. The headings are Barn Hill, Brondesbury, Buck Lane, Harlesden, Homestead Park, Kensal Green, Kensal Rise, Kilburn, Lawns Court, Mapesbury, Mount Stewart, Neasden Village, North Kilburn, Northwick Circle, Paddington Cemetery, Queens Park, Roe Green Village, South Kilburn, St. Andrews, Sudbury Cottages, Sudbury Court, Wembley High Street and Willesden Green. Treat the council's list as the one that decides and confirm your address with the conservation team.
The page gives designation dates. Roe Green Village was designated in November 1968, Buck Lane and South Kilburn in February 1979, Mapesbury in December 1982, Queens Park in July 1986 (extended July 1995) and Willesden Green in January 1993. The page says Brent has one Grade I building, nine Grade II* and around 200 Grade II. Design guides are linked for Barn Hill, Mapesbury, Mount Stewart, North Kilburn, Queens Park, Roe Green Village and Sudbury Court. For the other areas the page lists none.
Status changes what is allowed. A dormer is an enlargement of the roof, and Class B of Part 1 of the General Permitted Development Order does not apply on article 2(3) land, which includes conservation areas. The council's own page says conservation areas have fewer permitted development rights, and its validation list asks for a heritage statement for householder applications in them. Our conservation areas and Article 4 guide explains the national rules, and the neighbouring Camden borough page covers the other side of the Kilburn boundary.
The council's Article 4 page says all of Brent's residential conservation areas are covered by Article 4 directions and points to a separate list of controls for each area. The conservation areas page names directions for most areas but not for four of them.
| Direction or area | Dates and status on the council's pages | What it affects |
|---|---|---|
| Residential conservation areas | The Article 4 page says all are covered; the heritage page shows Article 4 notes against most areas, some marked new or non-immediate, and no Article 4 document for Harlesden, Lawns Court, Paddington Cemetery or South Kilburn | Rights removed differ by area, so the direction for your street decides |
| Houses in multiple occupation (C3 to C4) | Made 14 October 2021, confirmed 3 February 2022, in force 1 November 2022. Covers Brent except the OPDC area, the Church End Growth Area site allocations and the other seven Growth Areas. The HMO SPD was adopted on 3 November 2022 | Inside that area, change of use from a dwelling to a small HMO needs planning permission |
| Class E to homes and demolition (SIL and LSIS, site allocations, town centres, elsewhere) | Four directions confirmed 29 July 2022, in force 1 August 2022; the Secretary of State directed modifications to all four by letter of 9 February 2024 | Removes Class MA and, in some areas, Class M and Class ZA rights; the page notes the Old Oak and Park Royal Development Corporation made its own direction |
| Manor Close | Conservation area until 2004; the direction remains in effect and no date is given on the page | Hard standing for vehicle parking in front gardens |
| Sudbury Cottages | De-designated on 28 May 2024; the heritage page lists an immediate direction for 114 and 116 Elms Lane | Those two addresses only |
Source: London Borough of Brent, Article 4 Directions page (last updated 17 May 2024 on the page) and Listed buildings and conservation areas page, read 14 October 2026. The page does not say which of the Class E directions are immediate or non-immediate. The heritage page lists no Article 4 document for Harlesden, Lawns Court, Paddington Cemetery or South Kilburn, and does not say whether the council treats them as residential conservation areas. Our dataset, from the national planning data register as at 15 August 2026, records 39 Article 4 directions covering 162 mapped areas for Brent; we have not reconciled that with the council's list. Read the direction document for your street.
Often. Policy BD3 of the Local Plan says a basement under an existing property must be ancillary to the dwelling above if habitable, be no wider than the original building, extend no further than the existing front elevation, go no further than 3m to the rear and one storey down (4m floor to ceiling for a detached house, 3m otherwise), and be protected from sewer flooding by a pumped device. Front lightwells must be no more than the smaller of 800mm or half the garden length.
The Basement SPD, adopted in June 2017, adds that a basement in a conservation area or under a flat needs planning permission and that applicants are strongly encouraged to use pre-application advice. It also says parts of the borough are affected by flooding from the River Brent and its tributaries. The SPD pre-dates the 2022 Local Plan and cites older policy numbers such as DMP9a, so use BD3 for the current policy wording. The householder validation list asks for a basement impact assessment with every application that includes a basement.
Our basement conversion plans service covers the drawings side. A party wall notice under the Party Wall etc. Act 1996 is separate from planning: the Basement SPD covers it under other consents (section 1.3), and the Extensions SPD repeats it at 1.6.
The council's householder validation list combines national and local requirements, and its page on preparing an application was last updated on 1 September 2026. The list itself carries no date.
Tell us about your project and get a fixed, no-obligation quote back within one working day. If you don't need planning permission at all, we'll tell you that too — for free.
The Local Plan contains growth area policies for Wembley, Neasden Stations, Staples Corner, Burnt Oak and Colindale, Northwick Park, Church End, South Kilburn and Alperton. The part of the borough administered by the Old Oak and Park Royal Development Corporation is excluded from the area of the council's emerging Local Plan. The council has adopted masterplan SPDs for Staples Corner (12 November 2024), Neasden Stations, Church End and South Kilburn.
For a householder the practical point is flats. The Extensions SPD says maisonettes, flats and houses converted into flats normally need planning permission for most external changes, and the permitted development rules for house extensions apply to houses only. A flat or maisonette project is a full planning application, not a householder one, and the SPD's 10% biodiversity net gain note applies to flats where the work affects more than 25 square metres of land.
The SPD also says that in growth areas, intensification corridors, town centres and areas with a public transport accessibility level of 3 or more, private external amenity space is desirable, and that any such space should be designed to reduce overlooking of neighbouring windows and gardens, for example with screening.
Interwar homes are the largest of the three older periods shown, 32.0% of dwellings with a recorded build period, and Brent has the smallest post-war share of the 33 London boroughs. That is the stock the prior approval route most often suits, which is one reason the statistics look the way they do. The reason is our reading, not a council finding.
| Build period | Share of homes | What it points to |
|---|---|---|
| Before 1919 | 28.2% | 16th of 33 boroughs; Victorian and Edwardian terraces with outriggers, where the SPD's outrigger and side-return tests apply |
| 1919 to 1939 | 32.0% | 12th of 33 boroughs, the largest group; interwar semis, where the SPD's roof, hip-to-gable and rear dormer guidance (3.6) applies |
| 1945 to 1972 | 7.6% | The lowest of the 33 boroughs; post-war houses and estates; house permitted development rights do not apply to flats |
Shares of the 134,820 Brent dwellings with a recorded build period. Source: Valuation Office Agency, council tax stock of properties (CTSOP4.1), as at 31 March 2025. The table shows three periods only; homes built from 1973 onward make up the rest. The published bands skip 1940-1944. Rank across the 33 London boroughs is computed from the same data.
Check the address against the council's list of conservation areas and its Article 4 page, then the Residential Extensions and Alterations SPD, then the Local Plan policy that applies to your project: BD3 for a basement, BH12 for an outbuilding, BHC1 where a heritage asset is involved. Those three steps go a long way to deciding whether a rear extension or loft can use permitted development, needs prior approval, or needs an application read against the SPD's garden-length, 45 degree and set-back tests.
Flood risk is the other early check. The SPD says that if an extension or outbuilding falls in an area of surface water flooding shown on the Local Plan policies map, the application will have to be amended, usually with a flood risk assessment. The council's page on special considerations says properties in flood risk areas may need additional drainage or flood risk assessments, and points to the interactive planning map for conservation areas, Article 4 directions and flood zones.
Brent refuses roughly one large rear extension in three at prior approval, so we test the depth, garden length and neighbour relationship before anything is submitted.
We check the address against the council's conservation area list and Article 4 page and the policies map, and note which rights are removed.
We measure the house as built. Limits run from the original rear wall and roof, so earlier additions change the route.
We compare permitted development, a lawful development certificate, prior approval and a householder planning application, and say which is safest for your plot.
Plans, elevations and sections show levels, the rear building line, window positions and the 45 degree lines, with a heritage statement where the validation list asks for one.
We submit to Brent, answer the case officer and revise the drawings free of charge until the council decides.
Brent's approval rate against the national one, from MHCLG planning application statistics.
Source: MHCLG planning application statistics (householder decisions, England, 1 April 2025 - 31 March 2026). Compare every borough on our London approval-rate league table.
Brent granted 85.5% of the householder applications it decided in the 2025-26 financial year, 790 of 924, with 134 refused. That is almost level with the London rate of 85.6% across 24,758 decisions and below the England rate of 90.3%. It ranks 17th of the 32 London boroughs with a published rate. Prior approval for large rear extensions is a separate route, where Brent refused 79 of 243.
In 2025-26, 97.5% of Brent's standard householder decisions came within eight weeks, 673 of 690, which ranks 4th of 32 London boroughs. A further 234 decisions were made under planning performance agreements or agreed extensions of time, and those are left out of that figure. The eight weeks run from the day after the council receives a valid application with the fee (DMPO 2015 article 34), so an incomplete drawing pack costs time before the clock begins.
The Residential Extensions and Alterations SPD, adopted 16 January 2025, says single-storey rear extensions could be up to 6m deep on attached homes and 8m on detached ones, but not more than half the garden length, and with acceptable daylight to habitable rooms and no significant harm to neighbours' outlook or amenity space. Two-storey rear extensions must not exceed 3m on attached homes or 4m on detached ones. The SPD says it is not intended for conservation areas or listed buildings.
The statistics give no reasons. In 2025-26 Brent decided 243 and refused 79, 32.5%, the 7th highest of 24 boroughs with a published rate. Prior approval turns on the effect on adjoining neighbours once an objection is made, and the council says it will seek to apply its SPD guidance, including the half-garden-length and daylight tests. A householder planning application assessed against the SPD, or an appeal against the refusal, are the alternatives.
The page says 22. It lists 23 headings, but one, Sudbury Cottages, is marked de-designated on 28 May 2024, leaving 22, including Kensal Rise, designated that day. The Local Plan (2022) also says 22, about 7% of the borough, before those changes. The national register in our dataset (15 August 2026) records 23, which we have not reconciled. Check your own address with the council before you rely on permitted development.
The council's Article 4 page says all of Brent's residential conservation areas are covered by Article 4 directions, though its heritage page lists no Article 4 document for Harlesden, Lawns Court, Paddington Cemetery or South Kilburn. The HMO direction was made 14 October 2021, confirmed 3 February 2022 and in force 1 November 2022. It covers Brent except the OPDC area, the Church End Growth Area site allocations and the other seven Growth Areas. Read the direction for your street before you start work.
It is the Brent Local Plan 2019-2041, adopted in February 2022. It replaced the 2010 Core Strategy, the 2011 Site Specific Allocations Document, the 2015 Wembley Area Action Plan and the 2016 Development Management Policies Plan. The council published a notice of intention to prepare a new plan on 30 June 2026 and ran scoping consultation from 2 to 30 September 2026, now closed. Its timetable file targets adoption in April 2029.
Often. The Basement SPD, adopted in June 2017, says a basement in a conservation area or under a flat needs planning permission. Local Plan policy BD3 limits a basement to the width of the original building, 3m to the rear and one storey down. The council's validation list asks for a basement impact assessment with any application that includes one, and a flood risk assessment in higher-risk areas.
Yes. The council's PREAPP 1 householder service is paid, gives a written response as standard, and aims to reply within 20 working days of the enquiry and payment. A meeting is available for an additional fee. Each enquiry covers one proposal. The council describes the advice as informal and says it does not guarantee that permission will be granted.
On a house outside a conservation area it can be permitted development if it meets all the Class B limits and conditions, including 40 cubic metres (terrace) or 50 (other houses), under Class B of Part 1 of the General Permitted Development Order. Class B does not apply on article 2(3) land, which includes conservation areas, or to flats. Where a dormer needs consent, the SPD asks for it to sit at least 0.2m up from the original eaves.
Answer five quick questions and get a free planning score for your exact address — instantly. Then, if you want the full picture, unlock the detailed analysis: your council's live approval rates, local precedents, constraints on your street and a step-by-step route to permission.
Local, keyword-specific drawings tuned to your council's guidance.
Same fixed quotes, same fast drawings — wherever your project is.