
Havering planning decisions covered 1,019 householder applications in 2025-26, and the council granted 844 of them. That is an approval rate of 82.8%, against 85.6% across London, though 97.1% of standard cases were decided within eight weeks. Two schemes of property licensing began on 18 March 2026, and the council is consulting until 16 October 2026 on a new HMO Article 4 direction. Its extensions guide is still the 2011 SPD.
Photo: David Howard, CC BY-SA 2.0
Havering decides a very high volume of householder cases, quickly, with an approval rate a little below the London average and appellants doing better than in most boroughs.
| Measure | Havering | London | England |
|---|---|---|---|
| Householder applications decided, 2025-26 | 1,019 | 24,758 | 151,867 |
| Householder approval rate | 82.8% | 85.6% | 90.3% |
| Decided within 8 weeks (standard cases) | 97.1% | β | β |
| Large extension prior approvals decided | 228 | β | β |
| Large extension prior approvals refused | 11.8% | β | β |
| Householder appeals allowed, five years | 44.1% | 39.9% | 34.4% |
Approval, speed and prior approvals: MHCLG district planning application statistics (PS1/PS2), financial year 2025-26; the eight-week figure is 569 of 586 decisions excluding planning performance agreements and extensions of time. Appeals: Planning Inspectorate casework, five years to 30 June 2026, 124 of 281 determined householder appeals allowed. Derived in scripts/aggregate/.
Havering refused 175 of its 1,019 householder applications, which puts its approval rate 20th of the 32 boroughs with a published figure. It is the 6th busiest householder decision-maker in London and the 6th fastest on the eight-week measure (level with Kensington and Chelsea at one decimal place), with 569 of 586 standard decisions inside that time. A tidy first submission is rewarded with a quick answer, and a weak one gets a refusal just as quickly.
A further 433 decisions fell in the planning performance agreement and extension-of-time group, with 423 made within the agreed time. That is a large share of the borough's work, and it is left out of the eight-week figure. The council also decided 228 large home extension prior approvals, the 10th most in London, and refused 27, or 11.8%.
Appeals favour applicants more than in most places. The Planning Inspectorate allowed 124 of 281 householder appeals against Havering over five years, 44.1%, which is the 6th highest in London and 9.7 points above the national rate. That does not make an appeal a plan, but it suggests refusals are worth reading closely.

Two property licensing schemes began on 18 March 2026, according to a council release: selective licensing in seven of the borough's 20 wards, and additional licensing for homes rented to three or four unrelated people, which the release says applies to all wards in the borough. The planning rule is older. Two Article 4 directions, made on 3 November 2015, have removed permitted development rights to convert a house or flat to a small HMO since 13 July 2016, but the council's Local Plan says the second does not cover a change from a detached house. On 21 August 2026 the council published a proposal for a borough-wide direction so that all new HMOs need permission, with consultation until 16 October 2026. If confirmed, the council says it would take effect one year after it is made.
Gidea Park has the council's only area-based direction on householder rights that its Article 4 page describes, and it works on two control levels fixed address by address.
| Right (Part 1 or 2 of the GPDO) | Control Level 1 | Control Level 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Class A, house extensions | Front and sides | Front, sides and rear |
| Class C, roof alterations | Front and sides | Front, sides and rear |
| Class D, porches | Not listed | Front and sides |
| Class E, outbuildings, enclosures and pools (over 10 cubic metres in the notice) | Front, sides and rear | Front, sides and rear |
| Class F, hard surfaces | Front and sides | Front and sides |
| Part 2 Class A, gates, fences and walls | Not listed | Front and sides |
Source: London Borough of Havering, Gidea Park Article 4 Direction notice (reference Art4/4/2015, in force 31 December 2015, confirmed 24 June 2016), read 13 October 2026. The notice's Second Schedule says which streets and numbers are Level 1 or Level 2, so check the address rather than assuming the whole conservation area is the same. The notice also lists Part 2 Classes B and C at Level 2.
The council says there are 11 designated conservation areas, and the national planning data register also records 11. They are Corbets Tey, Cranham, Gidea Park, Havering-atte-Bower, Langtons, North Ockendon, RAF Hornchurch, Rainham, Romford, St Andrews and St Leonards. Upminster, Harold Wood and Emerson Park are not on the list. Emerson Park and Hall Lane are policy areas with their own SPDs from 2009, not conservation areas.
The council's pages disagree about Article 4 directions. Its Article 4 page lists directions for HMOs, Gidea Park and one building in Upminster, Exchange House. Its heritage page says Gidea Park, Havering-atte-Bower and Cranham have directions in place, for satellite dishes and for gates, walls and fences. We did not find direction notices for the last two, so confirm them with the council. The council also adopted new appraisals for Romford, Rainham and Gidea Park in September 2025, replacing ones from 2008.
The council's Residential Extensions and Alterations SPD, adopted in March 2011, is the document an officer measures a householder scheme against, and it sets out numbers for each project.
| Project | What the SPD says | Paragraph |
|---|---|---|
| Single-storey rear | As a general rule 3m deep for a terrace house and 4m for a semi-detached or detached house; any greater depth within a 45 degree angle from that dimension | 5.3 |
| Two-storey rear | Rarely acceptable on terraces; set in at least 2m from the shared boundary and project no more than 3m, up to 4m in exceptional circumstances | 5.10, 5.13 and 5.14 |
| Side extension | Detached houses should not be extended up to side boundaries; two-storey side extensions set back at least 1m at first floor; no breaking a 45 degree line from a neighbour's side window | 6.4, 6.6 and 6.8 |
| Dormers | Normally facing the rear garden; never above the ridge; a front dormer, if no harm, no wider than 1.2m; one in a hipped roof end not normally acceptable | 8.2 to 8.7 |
| Garages | Not forward of the main building line and rarely acceptable in a front garden | 9.8 |
Source: London Borough of Havering, Residential Extensions and Alterations SPD (adopted March 2011), read 13 October 2026. The council's Local Development Scheme says there are no current plans to update it ahead of the new Local Plan. It pre-dates the 2021 Local Plan and is guidance, not a permitted development limit.
The council's Local Plan says more than half of the borough is designated Metropolitan Green Belt, as shown on the Policies Map. The council pages we read do not set out a householder test for extensions in the Green Belt, and the 2011 SPD does not mention it. So ask the council before assuming a standard suburban extension test applies. The pre-application page also says the council cannot offer telephone advice for conservation area, Green Belt or listed building properties, though written advice is available, with a response aimed within 20 working days.
On permitted development, the council's validation page refers to larger single-storey rear extensions of up to 6m for an attached property or 8m for a detached one. Its older guidance note describes the larger-extension scheme as running from 30 May 2013 to 30 May 2019, so the council's own documents are out of step. Check the current national rules before you rely on a depth. The council advises a certificate of lawfulness for confirmation.
The council's householder checklist lists the national documents plus local items, and warns that missing information is likely to make the application invalid on receipt. The council's application process page gives a decision target of eight weeks for smaller applications such as house extensions, and 13 for larger ones.
Havering's homes skew to the middle of the twentieth century: 35.3% were built between 1945 and 1972, second only to the City of London.
| Build period | Share of homes | What usually follows |
|---|---|---|
| Before 1919 | 5.0% | A small share of the stock, 31st of 33 boroughs |
| 1919 to 1939 | 35.7% | Interwar semis and terraces; 7th highest share in London |
| 1945 to 1972 | 35.3% | Post-war houses and flats; flats have no householder (Part 1) permitted development rights |
Shares of the 108,350 Havering dwellings with a recorded build period. Source: Valuation Office Agency, council tax stock of properties (CTSOP4.1), as at 31 March 2025. The published bands have a genuine gap over 1940 to 1944, so the rows do not sum to 100%. Rank across the 33 London boroughs is computed from the same data.
Check four things before drawing: whether the address is in one of the 11 conservation areas or on a Gidea Park street with an Article 4 control level; whether the project is a house-to-HMO change; whether the Green Belt applies; and whether the 2011 SPD depth and side rules are met. Havering planning decisions turn on those points. The adopted plan is the Local Plan 2016-2031, and the council says it is preparing a replacement, though its pages are out of step on the timetable.
Tell us about your project and get a fixed, no-obligation quote back within one working day. If you don't need planning permission at all, we'll tell you that too β for free.
Havering decides quickly and refuses one case in six, so the work is in a complete first submission and an early route decision.
We check the address against the council's 11 conservation areas, the Gidea Park control levels and the HMO directions, and look at the Green Belt on the Policies Map.
We measure the house as built. Limits run from the original rear wall and roof, so earlier extensions change the route.
We compare permitted development, a certificate of lawfulness, large home extension prior approval and a full application. The council decided 228 prior approvals last year.
We draw to the scales and annotations in the council's householder checklist and test the scheme against the 2011 SPD depth, side and dormer figures.
We submit to Havering, respond to the case officer and revise the drawings free of charge until the council decides.
Havering's approval rate against the national one, refreshed as each quarter of MHCLG data is released.
Source: MHCLG planning application statistics (householder decisions, England, 1 April 2025 - 31 March 2026). Compare every borough on our London approval-rate league table.
Havering granted 82.8% of the householder applications it decided in the 2025-26 financial year, 844 of 1,019, with 175 refused. That is below the London rate of 85.6% across 24,758 decisions and the England rate of 90.3%. The council ranks 20th of the 32 London boroughs with a published rate, and 97.1% of its standard cases were decided within eight weeks.
It is the Havering Local Plan 2016-2031, adopted on 17 November 2021, which replaced the Core Strategy and Development Control Policies of 2008. The council says it is preparing a replacement and shows it at the evidence-gathering stage, though its Local Development Scheme planned earlier consultation. The 2021 plan remains the adopted plan.
The council says 11: Corbets Tey, Cranham, Gidea Park, Havering-atte-Bower, Langtons, North Ockendon, RAF Hornchurch, Rainham, Romford, St Andrews and St Leonards. The national planning data register also records 11. Upminster, Harold Wood and Emerson Park are not conservation areas, though Emerson Park has its own policy area SPD from 2009.
It is a direction, reference Art4/4/2015, confirmed on 24 June 2016, that removes some permitted development rights on named streets in the conservation area. There are two control levels. Level 1 covers Class A and C to the front and sides and Class E on all sides. Level 2 is stronger and adds the rear, porches and boundary walls. The notice says which street is which.
Usually yes. Two Article 4 directions have applied since 13 July 2016: any dwelling type in four named wards, and a flat, terraced or semi-detached house elsewhere. The Local Plan says a detached house outside those wards is not covered. The council is consulting until 16 October 2026 on a borough-wide direction. Licensing is separate and began on 18 March 2026.
Possibly. A council release says additional licensing applies to all wards in the borough for homes rented to three or four unrelated people sharing amenities, and selective licensing covers seven of the 20 wards for homes let to single families or up to two unrelated tenants. Both started on 18 March 2026. A licence is not planning permission, and neither replaces the other.
The council's 2011 SPD says as a general rule 3m for a terrace house and 4m for a semi-detached or detached house, with greater depth within a 45 degree angle. For permitted development, the validation page refers to larger single-storey rear extensions up to 6m for an attached property or 8m for a detached one. The council advises a certificate of lawfulness for certainty.
Only where the council considers they cause no harm. The SPD says dormers should normally face the rear garden and never rise above the ridge. If a front dormer is acceptable, its width should be no greater than 1.2m, and the combined width of several should not exceed half the width of the roof. A dormer in a hipped roof end will not normally be acceptable.
The council's checklist lists the application form, ownership certificate, fee, a location plan and a site plan, plus floor and roof plans and elevations at a minimum of 1:50 or 1:100. A heritage statement is required in a conservation area or for a listed building. Missing information is likely to make the application invalid on receipt, and you can only submit one proposal per application.
The Local Plan says more than half of the borough is designated Metropolitan Green Belt, as shown on the Policies Map. The council pages we read do not set out a householder extension test, and the 2011 SPD does not mention the Green Belt. Ask the council before relying on a standard suburban extension test, and note that telephone pre-application advice is not offered for Green Belt properties.
Better than in most boroughs. The Planning Inspectorate allowed 44.1% of householder appeals against Havering over the five years to 30 June 2026, 124 of 281, against 39.9% across London and 34.4% in England. That is the sixth highest share in London. An appeal still takes months, so a revised application can be the faster route.
Answer five quick questions and get a free planning score for your exact address β instantly. Then, if you want the full picture, unlock the detailed analysis: your council's live approval rates, local precedents, constraints on your street and a step-by-step route to permission.
Local, keyword-specific drawings tuned to your council's guidance.
Same fixed quotes, same fast drawings β wherever your project is.