Two-storey extension drawings for Fort Pitt homes — bedroom above, living space below, drawn against the 3-metre projection and 7-metre boundary rules and to Medway Council's design guidance, delivered in days and revised free until your decision.
Medway Council granted 96% of the householder planning decisions it made in its latest published year — 9 points above the 87% England-wide householder average. Fort Pitt contains Maidstone Road, Chatham, New Road, Chatham, New Road, Rochester conservation areas (Maidstone Road, Chatham designated 2005), so materials, fenestration and roof form are assessed against the appraisal, which is where a policy-literate drawing pack earns its keep. Its dominant Victorian (1837–1901), Edwardian (1901–1910) and interwar (1918–1939) housing stock sets the design brief on most streets.
Before permission is required, Class B allows 40m³ of added loft volume on a terrace and 50m³ on a semi or detached house, and Class A allows a 3m single-storey rear extension on a terrace or 4m on a detached house. Fort Pitt carries at least one Article 4 direction, and conservation areas including Maidstone Road, Chatham, New Road, Chatham and New Road, Rochester remove those rights outright, so we confirm your exact address before a line is drawn. A validated householder application in Fort Pitt is determined against an 8-week statutory target.
Maidstone Road, Chatham (conservation area designated in 2005), New Road, Chatham (conservation area designated in 1972), New Road, Rochester (conservation area designated in 1995) and Star Hill to Sun Pier (conservation area designated in 1994) — these are the Fort Pitt pockets our drawings cover most. Heritage designations here include Maidstone Road, Chatham, New Road, Chatham, New Road, Rochester and Star Hill to Sun Pier. Medway Council weighs each proposal against Medway Council's development plan and the design policies it applies to householder applications, where the 5,140 homes here are 28% 1930-1939, 21% pre-1900, 9% 1900-1918, which is what sets the realistic roof and rear-projection options. On roofs the borough is hipped roofs with shallow pitches typical of 1930s building and steeply pitched slate roofs, valley gutters and party parapets typical of pre-1900 building, over 1930s semi-detached and detached houses (28% of 5,140 homes), Victorian and earlier houses (21%) and Edwardian houses (9%).
What is permitted in Fort Pitt turns on designation first, so that is where we start: Maidstone Road, Chatham (conservation area designated in 2005), New Road, Chatham (conservation area designated in 1972), New Road, Rochester (conservation area designated in 1995) and Star Hill to Sun Pier (conservation area designated in 1994). Inside those boundaries permitted development is curtailed and Medway Council assesses materials, window detail and roof form against the area's own appraisal, so a scheme that would be waved through two streets away can need a full application here.
Medway Council has 47 recorded Article 4 directions — check the address before assuming PD applies in Fort Pitt.
On stock, Fort Pitt is 1930s semi-detached and detached houses (28% of 5,140 homes), Victorian and earlier houses (21%) and Edwardian houses (9%) — which is why hipped roofs with shallow pitches typical of 1930s building and steeply pitched slate roofs, valley gutters and party parapets typical of pre-1900 building govern what a loft or rear projection can realistically be. Medway Council decided 540 householder applications in the latest published year and granted 96%, with 94% issued inside the eight-week target. We draw to that record rather than to a national average.
The full build-period split for Fort Pitt runs pre-1900 21% (1,080 homes), 1900-1918 9% (460 homes), 1919-1929 5% (250 homes), 1930-1939 28% (1,440 homes), 1945-1954 1% (50 homes), 1955-1964 8% (410 homes), 1965-1972 1% (70 homes), 1973-1982 3% (160 homes), 1983-1992 4% (190 homes), 1993-1999 5% (250 homes) and 2000-2008 5% (240 homes). That distribution is why pre-1900 detailing dominates the drawings here, and it is measured from council-tax records rather than assumed from the street name.
Medway Council also decides for All Saints, Rainham North, Rainham South East and Strood Rural, so a decision in Fort Pitt sits inside a wider pattern of decisions we track across the same authority — useful when an officer cites a precedent from the next area over.
The Article 4 directions recorded for this council include Brompton Lines(1), Brompton Lines(2), Chatham Central & Brompton and Fort Pitt. Each removes a specific permitted-development right inside its own boundary, which is why the check is done on the address rather than on the town.
Published figures for Fort Pitt and Medway Council. These are the numbers that decide what is realistic on your street, so we work from them rather than from national averages.
| Measure | Fort Pitt |
|---|---|
| Dwellings recorded | 5,140 |
| Built pre-1900 | 1,080 (21%) |
| Built 1900-1918 | 460 (9%) |
| Built 1919-1929 | 250 (5%) |
| Built 1930-1939 | 1,440 (28%) |
| Built 1945-1954 | 50 (1%) |
| Built 1955-1964 | 410 (8%) |
| Built 1965-1972 | 70 (1%) |
| Built 1973-1982 | 160 (3%) |
| Built 1983-1992 | 190 (4%) |
| Built 1993-1999 | 250 (5%) |
| Built 2000-2008 | 240 (5%) |
| Built before 1919 | 30% |
| Built 1919–1939 | 33% |
| Built 1945–2008 | 27% |
| Conservation areas in Fort Pitt | 4 (Maidstone Road, Chatham, New Road, Chatham…) |
| Conservation areas district-wide | 24 |
| Article 4 directions recorded | 47 |
| Householder applications decided | 540 |
| Householder applications granted | 96% |
| Decided within 8 weeks | 94% |
Dwelling stock from VOA council-tax data at 31 March 2025; conservation-area and Article 4 counts from planning.data.gov.uk (MHCLG); decision figures are Medway Council's own, from MHCLG live table PS2 for the year to 31 March 2026.
Adding at first floor changes the question the case officer asks. A single-storey extension is judged mostly on daylight and garden loss; a two-storey extension is judged on overlooking, bulk against the neighbouring roofline, and whether it reads as part of the house or bolted onto it. Fort Pitt is largely 1930s semi-detached and detached houses (28% of 5,140 homes), Victorian and earlier houses (21%) and Edwardian houses (9%), and hipped roofs with shallow pitches typical of 1930s building and steeply pitched slate roofs, valley gutters and party parapets typical of pre-1900 building set what a matching roof actually means here.
The permitted-development route exists but is narrow: 3 metres of rear projection, a 7-metre stand-off from the rear boundary, eaves and ridge no higher than the original, and side-facing upper windows obscure-glazed and non-opening below 1.7 metres above floor level. Most two-storey schemes fail one of those, usually the 7-metre boundary rule on a shorter garden, and go in as a full application instead. We establish which route applies before designing, because it changes the drawing set.
Fort Pitt contains Maidstone Road, Chatham, New Road, Chatham, New Road, Rochester conservation areas (Maidstone Road, Chatham designated 2005), so materials, fenestration and roof form are assessed against the appraisal. Medway Council has 47 recorded Article 4 directions — check the address before assuming PD applies in Fort Pitt.
Some two-storey rear extensions are permitted development. You will need a full application to Medway Council if any of these apply:
We set the projection and boundary distance on the site plan, prove the roof-pitch match on the elevations, and specify obscure glazing on the side windows — the three things Medway Council checks first — then submit a validation-complete pack.
Below is Medway Council's real householder decision record, drawn from official planning statistics and refreshed as new data lands. Medway Council granted 96% of its householder applications in the year to 31 March 2026, and Maidstone Road, Chatham shapes what is approved here. Two-storey schemes attract more neighbour comment than any other householder work, so the overlooking and daylight case has to be made on the drawings.
Source: MHCLG planning application statistics (householder decisions, England, 1 April 2025 - 31 March 2026). Compare every borough on our London approval-rate league table.
Tell us about your project and get a fixed, no-obligation quote back within one working day. If you don't need planning permission at all, we'll tell you that too — for free.
Across Maidstone Road, Chatham, New Road, Chatham and New Road, Rochester, the schemes that succeed set the first floor back from the ground floor, keep the ridge below the original, and treat the flank wall as blank or obscure-glazed. On 1930s semi-detached and detached houses (28% of 5,140 homes), matching the eaves line matters more than matching the brick: an extension that carries the existing eaves through reads as original even in a different material.
The 5,140 homes here are 28% 1930-1939, 21% pre-1900, 9% 1900-1918, which is what sets the realistic roof and rear-projection options. We draw the 45-degree daylight test from the neighbour's nearest habitable window, show the window positions in section, and set out the steel and foundation implications early — a two-storey extension changes the load path, so the structural design and the planning design have to be developed together rather than in sequence.
We draw two-storey extensions across Fort Pitt. A few of the areas where they come up most often:
Two storey extension drawings for Maidstone Road, Chatham — conservation area designated in 2005 — dimensioned against the 3m and 7m limits and drawn to Medway Council's guidance.
Two storey extension drawings for New Road, Chatham — conservation area designated in 1972 — dimensioned against the 3m and 7m limits and drawn to Medway Council's guidance.
Two storey extension drawings for New Road, Rochester — conservation area designated in 1995 — dimensioned against the 3m and 7m limits and drawn to Medway Council's guidance.
Two storey extension drawings for Star Hill to Sun Pier — conservation area designated in 1994 — dimensioned against the 3m and 7m limits and drawn to Medway Council's guidance.
The first-floor limits are tighter than the ground-floor ones. This is how the common cases compare.
| Scheme | Permitted development? | Deciding limit | What Medway Council checks |
|---|---|---|---|
| Two-storey rear, 3m projection, 7m+ to boundary | Often yes | 3m projection / 7m boundary | Roof match, side-window glazing |
| Two-storey rear, under 7m to boundary | No — full application | Rear-boundary distance | Overlooking, daylight, garden loss |
| Two-storey side extension | No — full application | Side elevation | Gap to boundary, street rhythm |
| Two-storey wraparound | No — full application | Combined footprint | Bulk, massing, neighbour amenity |
| Any two-storey on designated land | No — full application | Designation | Character and appearance |
Limits from the GPDO 2015, Schedule 2, Part 1, Class A — two-storey rear extension conditions.
A fixed process built around how Medway Council validates and decides two-storey applications.
Send us your Fort Pitt postcode and garden depth. We measure the 7-metre boundary rule against your plot, confirm designation status, and score your odds against live Medway Council decisions.
We measure the original rear wall, eaves and ridge heights, garden depth and every neighbouring window that faces the site — the inputs the daylight and overlooking case is built from.
Chartered designers develop the two-storey addition to your brief with the roof and eaves resolved, and we coordinate the load path so the structural scheme and the planning scheme are the same building.
We submit the application, manage validation and case-officer queries, and revise the drawings free until Medway Council issues its decision.
Often, but not always. A two-storey rear extension can be permitted development if it projects no more than 3 metres, sits at least 7 metres from the rear boundary, does not exceed the existing eaves and ridge, and has obscure-glazed non-opening side windows below 1.7 metres. In Fort Pitt, the 7-metre rule is what most commonly forces a full application to Medway Council.
No part of a permitted-development two-storey rear extension may come within 7 metres of the boundary opposite the rear wall of the house. It exists to protect the neighbour behind you from being overlooked at first floor. On shorter Fort Pitt gardens this is decisive, and we measure it on survey before any design work rather than discovering it at validation. Medway Council is the decision-maker.
Not under permitted development — two-storey side extensions always need a full application to Medway Council. They are assessed on the gap to the boundary, whether the street's rhythm of spaces between houses survives, and whether the extension is subordinate to the original. Setting the first floor back from the front building line and down from the ridge is what usually makes the difference. This applies to your Fort Pitt address specifically.
Overlooking is the most common objection, and it is answerable on the drawings. We position habitable-room windows away from neighbouring gardens, obscure-glaze and fix shut anything on the flank below 1.7 metres, and show the sight lines in section. Where the geometry is tight, a rooflight or a high-level window gives the same daylight without the mutual overlooking that draws objections. This applies to your Fort Pitt address specifically. Medway Council is the decision-maker.
Almost certainly. Excavating within 3 metres of a neighbouring structure and building on or up to the boundary both trigger the Party Wall etc. Act 1996, and a two-storey extension usually does both. It is entirely separate from Medway Council's planning decision, so we flag the notice period early and detail the junction on the drawings. This applies to your Fort Pitt address specifically.
Yes. Adding a floor changes the load path from roof to foundation, so beams, padstones and foundation depths all need designing and calculating for building control. Planning and building regulations are separate consents, and the structural set is what building control assesses — we prepare both so the approved scheme is the buildable one. This applies to your Fort Pitt address specifically. Medway Council is the decision-maker.
We quote each Fort Pitt two-storey extension individually, because plot depth, roof form and structural complexity vary house to house, and send a fixed, no-obligation quote within one working day. It covers the drawing pack with free revisions until Medway Council approves. Call 020 7864 7245 to start.
Answer five quick questions and get a free planning score for your exact address — instantly. Then, if you want the full picture, unlock the detailed analysis: your council's live approval rates, local precedents, constraints on your street and a step-by-step route to permission.
Same fixed quotes, same fast drawings — wherever your project is.