Back-of-house extension drawings for Fort Pitt homes — the glazed kitchen-diner across the rear, drawn to Medway Council's depth and daylight limits, delivered in days and revised free until your decision, with a free approval-odds check first.
Medway Council granted 96% of the householder planning decisions it made in its latest published year — 9 points above the 87% England-wide householder average. Fort Pitt contains Maidstone Road, Chatham, New Road, Chatham, New Road, Rochester conservation areas (Maidstone Road, Chatham designated 2005), so materials, fenestration and roof form are assessed against the appraisal, which is where a policy-literate drawing pack earns its keep. Its dominant Victorian (1837–1901), Edwardian (1901–1910) and interwar (1918–1939) housing stock sets the design brief on most streets.
Before permission is required, Class B allows 40m³ of added loft volume on a terrace and 50m³ on a semi or detached house, and Class A allows a 3m single-storey rear extension on a terrace or 4m on a detached house. Fort Pitt carries at least one Article 4 direction, and conservation areas including Maidstone Road, Chatham, New Road, Chatham and New Road, Rochester remove those rights outright, so we confirm your exact address before a line is drawn. A validated householder application in Fort Pitt is determined against an 8-week statutory target.
Maidstone Road, Chatham (conservation area designated in 2005), New Road, Chatham (conservation area designated in 1972), New Road, Rochester (conservation area designated in 1995) and Star Hill to Sun Pier (conservation area designated in 1994) — these are the Fort Pitt pockets our drawings cover most. Heritage designations here include Maidstone Road, Chatham, New Road, Chatham, New Road, Rochester and Star Hill to Sun Pier. Medway Council weighs each proposal against Medway Council's development plan and the design policies it applies to householder applications, where the 5,140 homes here are 28% 1930-1939, 21% pre-1900, 9% 1900-1918, which is what sets the realistic roof and rear-projection options. On roofs the borough is hipped roofs with shallow pitches typical of 1930s building and steeply pitched slate roofs, valley gutters and party parapets typical of pre-1900 building, over 1930s semi-detached and detached houses (28% of 5,140 homes), Victorian and earlier houses (21%) and Edwardian houses (9%).
What is permitted in Fort Pitt turns on designation first, so that is where we start: Maidstone Road, Chatham (conservation area designated in 2005), New Road, Chatham (conservation area designated in 1972), New Road, Rochester (conservation area designated in 1995) and Star Hill to Sun Pier (conservation area designated in 1994). Inside those boundaries permitted development is curtailed and Medway Council assesses materials, window detail and roof form against the area's own appraisal, so a scheme that would be waved through two streets away can need a full application here.
Medway Council has 47 recorded Article 4 directions — check the address before assuming PD applies in Fort Pitt.
On stock, Fort Pitt is 1930s semi-detached and detached houses (28% of 5,140 homes), Victorian and earlier houses (21%) and Edwardian houses (9%) — which is why hipped roofs with shallow pitches typical of 1930s building and steeply pitched slate roofs, valley gutters and party parapets typical of pre-1900 building govern what a loft or rear projection can realistically be. Medway Council decided 540 householder applications in the latest published year and granted 96%, with 94% issued inside the eight-week target. We draw to that record rather than to a national average.
The full build-period split for Fort Pitt runs pre-1900 21% (1,080 homes), 1900-1918 9% (460 homes), 1919-1929 5% (250 homes), 1930-1939 28% (1,440 homes), 1945-1954 1% (50 homes), 1955-1964 8% (410 homes), 1965-1972 1% (70 homes), 1973-1982 3% (160 homes), 1983-1992 4% (190 homes), 1993-1999 5% (250 homes) and 2000-2008 5% (240 homes). That distribution is why pre-1900 detailing dominates the drawings here, and it is measured from council-tax records rather than assumed from the street name.
Medway Council also decides for All Saints, Rainham North, Rainham South East and Strood Rural, so a decision in Fort Pitt sits inside a wider pattern of decisions we track across the same authority — useful when an officer cites a precedent from the next area over.
The Article 4 directions recorded for this council include Brompton Lines(1), Brompton Lines(2), Chatham Central & Brompton and Fort Pitt. Each removes a specific permitted-development right inside its own boundary, which is why the check is done on the address rather than on the town.
Published figures for Fort Pitt and Medway Council. These are the numbers that decide what is realistic on your street, so we work from them rather than from national averages.
| Measure | Fort Pitt |
|---|---|
| Dwellings recorded | 5,140 |
| Built pre-1900 | 1,080 (21%) |
| Built 1900-1918 | 460 (9%) |
| Built 1919-1929 | 250 (5%) |
| Built 1930-1939 | 1,440 (28%) |
| Built 1945-1954 | 50 (1%) |
| Built 1955-1964 | 410 (8%) |
| Built 1965-1972 | 70 (1%) |
| Built 1973-1982 | 160 (3%) |
| Built 1983-1992 | 190 (4%) |
| Built 1993-1999 | 250 (5%) |
| Built 2000-2008 | 240 (5%) |
| Built before 1919 | 30% |
| Built 1919–1939 | 33% |
| Built 1945–2008 | 27% |
| Conservation areas in Fort Pitt | 4 (Maidstone Road, Chatham, New Road, Chatham…) |
| Conservation areas district-wide | 24 |
| Article 4 directions recorded | 47 |
| Householder applications decided | 540 |
| Householder applications granted | 96% |
| Decided within 8 weeks | 94% |
Dwelling stock from VOA council-tax data at 31 March 2025; conservation-area and Article 4 counts from planning.data.gov.uk (MHCLG); decision figures are Medway Council's own, from MHCLG live table PS2 for the year to 31 March 2026.
The rear extension is the workhorse of Fort Pitt home improvement — it is how a dark back kitchen becomes an open family room facing the garden. Because the borough is built largely from 1930s semi-detached and detached houses (28% of 5,140 homes), Victorian and earlier houses (21%) and Edwardian houses (9%), most back walls sit close to a neighbour on at least one side, and that proximity, not the design, is what Medway Council scrutinises. The council reads the proposal against Medway Council's development plan and the design policies it applies to householder applications, and the first line an officer draws is the 45-degree splay from the neighbour's nearest window.
So the drawings live or die on geometry. We set the depth against the exact permitted-development figure, hold the eaves and the flat-roof or lantern build-up under the 4-metre height ceiling, and show the projection tested against both the 45-degree plan angle and the 25-degree section angle to the neighbouring windows. Fort Pitt contains Maidstone Road, Chatham, New Road, Chatham, New Road, Rochester conservation areas (Maidstone Road, Chatham designated 2005), so materials, fenestration and roof form are assessed against the appraisal, so the rear elevation is composed around it rather than corrected after an objection.
Where the property sits in a conservation area — Maidstone Road, Chatham, New Road, Chatham, New Road, Rochester and Star Hill to Sun Pier among Fort Pitt's — the larger-home extension route is switched off and even a modest rear addition needs consent. Medway Council has 47 recorded Article 4 directions — check the address before assuming PD applies in Fort Pitt. We confirm the designation before the survey.
Many single-storey rear extensions in Fort Pitt are permitted development and need no application. You will normally need to apply to Medway Council, or use the larger-home prior-approval route, if any of these apply:
We draw the depth, the roof build-up and the daylight splays to each neighbour on the page — the tests Medway Council's officers apply first — and submit a validation-complete pack, whether that is a lawful development certificate, a larger-home prior-approval notice or a full householder application.
Below is Medway Council's real householder decision record, taken from official planning statistics and refreshed as new data lands. Medway Council granted 96% of its householder applications in the year to 31 March 2026, and Maidstone Road, Chatham shapes what is approved here. Rear extensions turn most often on neighbour daylight and depth, so a drawing pack that proves those tests upfront is decided faster and refused less often than a DIY submission.
Source: MHCLG planning application statistics (householder decisions, England, 1 April 2025 - 31 March 2026). Compare every borough on our London approval-rate league table.
Tell us about your project and get a fixed, no-obligation quote back within one working day. If you don't need planning permission at all, we'll tell you that too — for free.
Across Maidstone Road, Chatham, New Road, Chatham and New Road, Rochester, the approved rear extension is typically a single-storey glazed box within the depth limit, roofed either flat with a lantern or in a shallow mono-pitch, and finished in brick or render to match the host wall. On the borough's 1930s semi-detached and detached houses (28% of 5,140 homes), keeping the projection to the permitted-development figure often avoids an application entirely; where owners want the full 6 metres, the larger-home route succeeds when the neighbour-consultation period passes without a sustained objection.
The 5,140 homes here are 28% 1930-1939, 21% pre-1900, 9% 1900-1918, which is what sets the realistic roof and rear-projection options. We keep the extension inside the daylight splays, set any glazed roof below the first-floor cill, and retain the garden depth Medway Council expects — so the back elevation answers the amenity case before a neighbour can lodge one. Two-storey rear extensions we draw with the 7-metre boundary gap and privacy screening resolved on the plan.
We draw rear extensions on every street in the borough. A few of the neighbourhoods where Fort Pitt back-of-house projects come up most often:
Rear extension drawings for Maidstone Road, Chatham's conservation area designated in 2005 — depth-checked, daylight-tested and drawn to Medway Council's guidance.
Rear extension drawings for New Road, Chatham's conservation area designated in 1972 — depth-checked, daylight-tested and drawn to Medway Council's guidance.
Rear extension drawings for New Road, Rochester's conservation area designated in 1995 — depth-checked, daylight-tested and drawn to Medway Council's guidance.
Rear extension drawings for Star Hill to Sun Pier's conservation area designated in 1994 — depth-checked, daylight-tested and drawn to Medway Council's guidance.
How far you can extend at the back in Fort Pitt depends on your house type and the route you take. This is how the options compare.
| Route | Depth allowed | Consent needed | What Medway Council checks |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard permitted development | 3m terrace/semi · 4m detached | Lawful development certificate (optional) | Depth, 4m height, materials |
| Larger-home prior approval | 6m terrace/semi · 8m detached | Prior-approval notice + neighbour consultation | Neighbour objections on amenity |
| Full householder application | Beyond the above, or two-storey | Full planning permission | Daylight (45°/25°), bulk, garden retained |
| Conservation area | Case by case | Full planning permission | Character, roof form, boundary treatment |
The larger-home route is switched off on designated land — conservation areas such as Maidstone Road, Chatham and New Road, Chatham and Article 4 streets need a full application.
A fixed process built around how Medway Council validates and decides rear-extension applications — most drawings are submission-ready within seven days of survey.
Send us your Fort Pitt postcode and house type. We confirm your conservation and Article 4 status, how much rear-extension depth you have under permitted development, and score your odds against live Medway Council decisions.
We measure the original rear wall, floor and eaves levels, side and rear boundary distances and the neighbours' window positions — the numbers the depth limit and daylight splays depend on.
Chartered designers develop the single or two-storey rear extension to your brief, drawn inside the permitted-development limits or to Medway Council's extension design guidance, with the daylight angles shown.
We submit the certificate, prior-approval notice or application, handle validation and case-officer queries, and revise the drawings free until Medway Council issues its decision.
Often not. A single-storey rear extension up to 3 metres deep on a terrace or semi, or 4 metres on a detached house, and no higher than 4 metres, is usually permitted development in Fort Pitt. You will need to involve Medway Council for anything deeper via the larger-home route, for two-storey rear extensions, and for any rear extension in a conservation area such as Maidstone Road, Chatham and New Road, Chatham, where those permitted-development rights fall away.
The larger-home extension scheme lets a single-storey rear extension reach 6 metres on a terrace or semi, or 8 metres on a detached house — double the standard allowance. It is not automatic: you submit a prior-approval notification to Medway Council, neighbours are consulted, and if one objects on amenity grounds the council rules on it. It also does not apply on designated land such as Fort Pitt's conservation areas.
It is the daylight test Medway Council applies to protect neighbours. Drawn on plan, a line at 45 degrees from the midpoint of the neighbour's nearest ground-floor window should not be crossed by your extension; a companion 25-degree line is checked in section. If the projection breaches it, the extension is likely to be shortened or refused, so we test and prove it on the drawings before submission. This applies to your Fort Pitt address specifically.
A two-storey rear extension almost always needs a full householder application to Medway Council, as it sits outside permitted development on most homes. The council checks that it stays at least 7 metres from the rear boundary, does not overbear the neighbours and avoids new overlooking. We resolve the boundary gap, privacy and daylight on the plans so the application is decided on its merits. This applies to your Fort Pitt address specifically.
Frequently, yes. If the rear extension involves work to a shared wall, building up to the boundary, or excavating foundations near a neighbour's structure, the Party Wall etc. Act applies and you must serve notice — this is separate from Medway Council's planning decision. We flag it early and can prepare the drawings a party-wall surveyor needs alongside the planning set. This applies to your Fort Pitt address specifically.
We price each Fort Pitt rear extension on its own footprint and send a fixed, no-obligation quote within one working day. It covers the full drawing pack with free revisions until Medway Council approves, and we confirm at the outset whether your extension is permitted development, needs prior approval, or a full application. Call 020 7864 7245 to begin.
Answer five quick questions and get a free planning score for your exact address — instantly. Then, if you want the full picture, unlock the detailed analysis: your council's live approval rates, local precedents, constraints on your street and a step-by-step route to permission.
Same fixed quotes, same fast drawings — wherever your project is.