Refused by Bexley Council? We read the decision notice, tell you honestly whether to appeal or resubmit, and prepare the drawings and statement that answer each reason for refusal on the Planning Inspectorate's terms.
Bexley Council granted 88% of the householder planning decisions it made in its latest published year — 1 point above the 87% England-wide householder average. Green Belt at Crayford Marshes and Foots Cray Meadows tightly limits extensions on the borough's fringes, which is where a policy-literate drawing pack earns its keep. Its dominant Victorian (1837–1901), interwar (1918–1939) and postwar (1945–1970) housing stock sets the design brief on most streets.
Before permission is required, Class B allows 40m³ of added loft volume on a terrace and 50m³ on a semi or detached house, and Class A allows a 3m single-storey rear extension on a terrace or 4m on a detached house. Bexley carries at least one Article 4 direction, and conservation areas including Bexley Village, Danson Park and Upton remove those rights outright, so we confirm your exact address before a line is drawn. A validated householder application in Bexley is determined against an 8-week statutory target.
Old Bexley (the historic village strung along Bexley High Street), Bexleyheath (interwar semis around Danson Park and the Upton conservation area), Sidcup (1930s houses and older streets near Old Sidcup and Foots Cray), Erith (riverside terraces and postwar housing by the Thames), Crayford (Victorian and interwar homes along the industrial edge) and Welling (dense interwar semi-detached suburbs) — these are the Bexley pockets our drawings cover most. Heritage designations here include Bexley Village, Danson Park, Upton, Old Sidcup and Foots Cray. Bexley Council weighs each proposal against the Bexley Local Plan and the borough's design guidance for householder development, where hipped roofs on paired semis mean hip-to-gable and dormers are judged on bulk and the pair's balance. On roofs the borough is hipped roofs on the interwar and postwar semis and gabled roofs on the detached houses, over interwar and postwar semi-detached houses, detached houses on larger plots and riverside and Victorian terraces.
Two routes exist and they suit different refusals. A free-go resubmission — a fresh application within twelve months of the refusal, on the same site and in the same description — costs no fee and lets you change the scheme. An appeal keeps the scheme as refused and asks an Inspector to disagree with Bexley Council. Where the refusal reasons are about design detail that can be fixed, resubmission is usually faster; where they are about principle, an appeal is the only route that resolves it.
The decision notice is the brief. Each numbered reason cites policy and states a harm, and the appeal has to meet each one with evidence — sections showing daylight, elevations showing the relationship to neighbours, a site plan proving separation distances. Assertion loses appeals. Bexley is largely interwar and postwar semi-detached houses, detached houses on larger plots and riverside and Victorian terraces, and hipped roofs on the interwar and postwar semis and gabled roofs on the detached houses shape what the Inspector will accept as characteristic here.
Green Belt at Crayford Marshes and Foots Cray Meadows tightly limits extensions on the borough's fringes, which frequently appears in refusal reasons and therefore has to be addressed head-on. Bexley applies Article 4 directions in conservation areas such as Bexley Village and Danson Park, and parts of the borough fall within Metropolitan Green Belt where extensions are firmly restricted.
We give an honest read of the decision notice first. An appeal is usually the right route where:
We take each numbered reason for refusal and answer it with a drawing or an evidenced statement — not with a restatement of the original application. That is the difference between an appeal that reads as a complaint and one that reads as a case.
Below is Bexley Council's real decision record, drawn from official planning statistics and refreshed as new data lands. Bexley approves a strong majority of householder applications, with Metropolitan Green Belt on its edges and the symmetry of paired suburban semis the main factors shaping approvals. Knowing what this authority actually refuses, and why, is the starting point for deciding whether to appeal or to redesign.
Source: MHCLG planning application statistics (householder decisions, rolling year). Compare every borough on our London approval-rate league table.
Tell us about your project and get a fixed, no-obligation quote back within one working day. If you don't need planning permission at all, we'll tell you that too — for free.
Across Old Bexley, Bexleyheath and Sidcup, the appeals that succeed are narrow and evidenced. They show the daylight test drawn rather than described, they cite the Inspector's own decisions on comparable sites, and they concede the points that are not worth arguing so the case concentrates on the ones that are. An appeal that disputes every reason equally reads as unfocused and usually fails on the strongest one.
Hipped roofs on paired semis mean hip-to-gable and dormers are judged on bulk and the pair's balance. Most householder appeals are decided by written representations, with the Inspector visiting the site unaccompanied. That makes the drawings the primary evidence: what is not on the page is not in front of the Inspector. We prepare the set on that basis, and where the honest answer is that the refusal was sound, we say so and redesign instead.
We prepare appeal drawings and statements across Bexley. A few of the areas where refusals come up most often:
Appeal drawings for Old Bexley — the historic village strung along Bexley High Street — answering Bexley Council's reasons for refusal with evidence rather than assertion.
Appeal drawings for Bexleyheath — interwar semis around Danson Park and the Upton conservation area — answering Bexley Council's reasons for refusal with evidence rather than assertion.
Appeal drawings for Sidcup — 1930s houses and older streets near Old Sidcup and Foots Cray — answering Bexley Council's reasons for refusal with evidence rather than assertion.
Appeal drawings for Erith — riverside terraces and postwar housing by the Thames — answering Bexley Council's reasons for refusal with evidence rather than assertion.
Appeal drawings for Crayford — Victorian and interwar homes along the industrial edge — answering Bexley Council's reasons for refusal with evidence rather than assertion.
Appeal drawings for Welling — dense interwar semi-detached suburbs — answering Bexley Council's reasons for refusal with evidence rather than assertion.
Three responses to a refusal, with different costs, timescales and prospects.
| Route | Deadline | Typical timescale | Best where |
|---|---|---|---|
| Householder appeal | 12 weeks from the decision | About 8–12 weeks | The refusal turns on principle or a disputed harm |
| Section 78 appeal (other) | 6 months from the decision | Several months | Larger schemes, change of use, new dwellings |
| Free-go resubmission | 12 months from the decision | 8 weeks | The reasons are fixable design detail |
| Fresh application, redesigned | No deadline | 8 weeks | The scheme needs a different approach entirely |
Deadlines from the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, section 78, and the Planning Inspectorate's published appeal procedures.
A process built around the decision notice, because that is what the Inspector reads first.
Send us the decision notice and the refused drawings. We tell you honestly whether the reasons are appealable, whether a resubmission is faster, and how Bexley Council has fared on comparable appeals.
We gather the material that answers each reason — daylight geometry, separation distances, decided appeals on similar sites, and the relevant policies read in full rather than in extract.
We prepare the drawings the Inspector needs and a statement of case that takes each numbered reason in turn, conceding what should be conceded and evidencing the rest.
We lodge the appeal inside the deadline, respond to the council's statement, and revise free until the Inspector issues a decision.
Twelve weeks from the date on the decision notice for a householder appeal, and six months for most other section 78 appeals. The deadline is strict and the Planning Inspectorate will not accept a late appeal, so the first thing we do on a Bexley refusal is check the date and work backwards from it. Bexley Council is the decision-maker.
It depends what the reasons say. If they identify design detail you are willing to change, a free-go resubmission within twelve months costs no application fee and usually resolves faster. If they refuse the principle — that an extension of this type does not belong here at all — only an appeal settles it, because a resubmission would meet the same objection. This applies to your Bexley address specifically. Bexley Council is the decision-maker.
Nationally, a minority of householder appeals succeed, and the ones that do tend to be narrow, evidenced and focused on a single disputed harm. We look at how Bexley Council's refusals have fared at appeal and at comparable decisions nearby before advising, and we will tell you when we think the refusal was sound — an appeal with no prospect costs months.
The scheme itself cannot change on appeal — the Inspector determines the application as refused. What usually needs preparing is evidence: sections showing daylight, elevations showing the relationship to neighbours, and context drawings showing what already exists on the street. Those explain why the refused scheme causes no harm, without altering it. This applies to your Bexley address specifically. Bexley Council is the decision-maker.
In most written-representation appeals, yes — usually unaccompanied, viewing the site from public land and neighbouring property where access is arranged. That is why the drawings matter so much: the Inspector sees the site once, briefly, and everything else comes from the paperwork you submitted. This applies to your Bexley address specifically. Bexley Council is the decision-maker.
Only where the council has behaved unreasonably — refusing against its own officer's clear recommendation without evidence, or failing to substantiate a reason for refusal. Costs awards are the exception rather than the norm, and they are decided separately from the appeal itself. Where the grounds genuinely exist, we make the application alongside the appeal. This applies to your Bexley address specifically. Bexley Council is the decision-maker.
We quote each Bexley appeal individually after reading the decision notice, because the work depends entirely on how many reasons are in play and what evidence they demand, and send a fixed, no-obligation quote within one working day. The refusal review itself is free. Call 020 7864 7245 to start. Bexley Council is the decision-maker.
Answer five quick questions and get a free planning score for your exact address — instantly. Then, if you want the full picture, unlock the detailed analysis: your council's live approval rates, local precedents, constraints on your street and a step-by-step route to permission.
Same fixed quotes, same fast drawings — wherever your project is.