Listed building consent drawings for Bexley — measured as existing, proposed in the same detail, and supported by a heritage statement that answers Bexley Council's conservation officer on the terms the 1990 Act actually sets.
Bexley Council granted 88% of the householder planning decisions it made in its latest published year — 1 point above the 87% England-wide householder average. Green Belt at Crayford Marshes and Foots Cray Meadows tightly limits extensions on the borough's fringes, which is where a policy-literate drawing pack earns its keep. Its dominant Victorian (1837–1901), interwar (1918–1939) and postwar (1945–1970) housing stock sets the design brief on most streets.
Before permission is required, Class B allows 40m³ of added loft volume on a terrace and 50m³ on a semi or detached house, and Class A allows a 3m single-storey rear extension on a terrace or 4m on a detached house. Bexley carries at least one Article 4 direction, and conservation areas including Bexley Village, Danson Park and Upton remove those rights outright, so we confirm your exact address before a line is drawn. A validated householder application in Bexley is determined against an 8-week statutory target.
Old Bexley (the historic village strung along Bexley High Street), Bexleyheath (interwar semis around Danson Park and the Upton conservation area), Sidcup (1930s houses and older streets near Old Sidcup and Foots Cray), Erith (riverside terraces and postwar housing by the Thames), Crayford (Victorian and interwar homes along the industrial edge) and Welling (dense interwar semi-detached suburbs) — these are the Bexley pockets our drawings cover most. Heritage designations here include Bexley Village, Danson Park, Upton, Old Sidcup and Foots Cray. Bexley Council weighs each proposal against the Bexley Local Plan and the borough's design guidance for householder development, where hipped roofs on paired semis mean hip-to-gable and dormers are judged on bulk and the pair's balance. On roofs the borough is hipped roofs on the interwar and postwar semis and gabled roofs on the detached houses, over interwar and postwar semi-detached houses, detached houses on larger plots and riverside and Victorian terraces.
Listing protects the whole building, not the front elevation. Removing a partition, replacing a staircase balustrade, changing a floor finish, or lining a wall with insulation are all alterations to special interest, and all can require consent. That surprises owners far more often than the external rules do — and it is why the first deliverable on a listed project is an accurate record of what is there, not a proposal for what replaces it.
Bexley sits within an area of interwar and postwar semi-detached houses, detached houses on larger plots and riverside and Victorian terraces, and its designated heritage includes Bexley Village, Danson Park, Upton, Old Sidcup and Foots Cray. Conservation-area designation and listing are different things and frequently overlap: a listed house inside a conservation area needs consent for internal work under the listing, and is judged on its contribution to the wider area under the designation. We establish both before proposing anything.
Section 16(2) of the 1990 Act requires Bexley Council to have special regard to the desirability of preserving the building, its setting and any features of special architectural or historic interest. In practice that means the drawings must show what is being lost as clearly as what is being gained, and the case for the intervention must be made on heritage terms rather than on convenience.
Consent from Bexley Council is required for works affecting special interest. That commonly includes:
We survey the building as existing at a level of detail that lets a conservation officer see the fabric, then draw the proposal in the same detail alongside a heritage statement — so the decision is made on evidence rather than on assumption.
Below is Bexley Council's real decision record, drawn from official planning statistics and refreshed as new data lands. Bexley approves a strong majority of householder applications, with Metropolitan Green Belt on its edges and the symmetry of paired suburban semis the main factors shaping approvals. Listed applications are decided on the quality of the record and the justification, which is where most refusals actually originate.
Source: MHCLG planning application statistics (householder decisions, rolling year). Compare every borough on our London approval-rate league table.
Tell us about your project and get a fixed, no-obligation quote back within one working day. If you don't need planning permission at all, we'll tell you that too — for free.
Across Old Bexley, Bexleyheath and Sidcup, the schemes that get consent tend to be reversible, legible and honest: new work that reads as new rather than as imitation, services routed in existing chases rather than cut into original fabric, and interventions concentrated in later or lower-significance parts of the building. Rear additions in a contemporary idiom are often accepted where a pastiche extension is refused.
Green Belt at Crayford Marshes and Foots Cray Meadows tightly limits extensions on the borough's fringes. Where planning permission is needed as well — for an extension, say — the two applications run in parallel and are usually determined together. We prepare them as a single coordinated set so the heritage case and the planning case do not contradict each other, which is a surprisingly common reason for a refusal on an otherwise sound scheme.
We prepare listed building consent packs across Bexley. A few of the areas where heritage work comes up most often:
Listed building consent drawings for Old Bexley — the historic village strung along Bexley High Street — surveyed as existing and drawn to the detail Bexley Council's conservation officer needs.
Listed building consent drawings for Bexleyheath — interwar semis around Danson Park and the Upton conservation area — surveyed as existing and drawn to the detail Bexley Council's conservation officer needs.
Listed building consent drawings for Sidcup — 1930s houses and older streets near Old Sidcup and Foots Cray — surveyed as existing and drawn to the detail Bexley Council's conservation officer needs.
Listed building consent drawings for Erith — riverside terraces and postwar housing by the Thames — surveyed as existing and drawn to the detail Bexley Council's conservation officer needs.
Listed building consent drawings for Crayford — Victorian and interwar homes along the industrial edge — surveyed as existing and drawn to the detail Bexley Council's conservation officer needs.
Listed building consent drawings for Welling — dense interwar semi-detached suburbs — surveyed as existing and drawn to the detail Bexley Council's conservation officer needs.
They are separate consents with different tests, and many projects need both.
| Consent | What it covers | Fee | Consequence of proceeding without it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Listed building consent | Works affecting special interest, internal and external | None | Criminal offence under section 9 of the 1990 Act |
| Planning permission | Development — extensions, outbuildings, use changes | Payable | Enforcement action; may become immune after 10 years |
| Conservation area consent context | Demolition and character in a designated area | Varies | Enforcement; prosecution for unauthorised demolition |
| Building regulations | Structure, fire, insulation, ventilation | Payable | Enforcement notice; problems on sale |
Sources: Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990, sections 7, 9 and 16(2); Town and Country Planning Act 1990.
A process built around what a conservation officer actually assesses.
Send us the address and the listing entry. We confirm grade, what the listing covers, whether curtilage structures are caught, and how Bexley Council has treated comparable schemes.
We survey as existing in real detail — plans, elevations, sections and the features that carry the significance — because a proposal cannot be assessed against a record that does not exist.
We draw the proposal in matching detail and write the heritage statement that identifies significance, impact and justification in the terms section 16(2) requires.
We submit to Bexley Council, engage with the conservation officer, and revise the drawings free until the decision is issued.
Frequently, yes. Listing covers the whole building, so removing a partition, altering a staircase, replacing joinery or re-plastering historic surfaces can all require consent from Bexley Council. There is no internal exemption and no size threshold. The safe route is to establish what is significant before work is designed, which is what the measured survey is for.
Carrying out unauthorised works to a listed building is a criminal offence under section 9 of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990, and it does not become lawful with the passage of time the way some planning breaches do. Bexley Council can require reinstatement. Where work has already happened, an application for retrospective consent is usually the right first step, and we can advise on it.
No. Listed building consent applications carry no application fee, which sometimes leads owners to assume the process is lighter than a planning application. It is not — the evidence expected is greater, because the decision rests on the effect on special interest rather than on amenity, and an under-documented submission is the most common cause of delay. This applies to your Bexley address specifically. Bexley Council is the decision-maker.
If the work is also development — an extension, an outbuilding, a change of use — then yes, and the two applications run in parallel to Bexley Council. Internal alterations usually need only listed building consent. Where both are required we prepare them as one coordinated set, because inconsistencies between the two submissions are a recurring reason for delay.
Sometimes, but rarely with modern units. Historic windows are often the single most significant surviving feature, and replacement is judged on the condition of the existing joinery and the accuracy of what replaces it — glazing bar profile, glass type, opening method and reveal depth all matter. Repair and secondary glazing are usually the route that gains consent, particularly inside designated areas such as Bexley Village and Danson Park. Bexley Council is the decision-maker.
The statutory target is eight weeks from validation for most applications, and thirteen for larger schemes. In practice the timetable is set by how complete the submission is: a conservation officer who has to ask what the existing fabric looks like will take longer than one who can see it. We submit a record that answers those questions upfront. This applies to your Bexley address specifically. Bexley Council is the decision-maker.
We quote each Bexley listed project individually, because the survey effort depends entirely on the building's complexity and how much of the fabric the work touches, and send a fixed, no-obligation quote within one working day. It covers survey, drawings and heritage statement, with free revisions until Bexley Council decides. Call 020 7864 7245 to start.
Answer five quick questions and get a free planning score for your exact address — instantly. Then, if you want the full picture, unlock the detailed analysis: your council's live approval rates, local precedents, constraints on your street and a step-by-step route to permission.
Same fixed quotes, same fast drawings — wherever your project is.