The full drawing set for a Hart application — location and block plans, existing and proposed floor plans, elevations and sections, drawn to Hart District Council's validation checklist so the pack is accepted first time, delivered in days and revised free until your decision, with a free approval-odds check first.
Hart District Council granted 86% of the householder planning decisions it made in its latest published year — 1 point below the 87% England-wide householder average. Hart contains Basingstoke Canal 1, Basingstoke Canal2, Basingstoke Canal3 conservation areas (Basingstoke Canal 1 designated 2009), so materials, fenestration and roof form are assessed against the appraisal, which is where a policy-literate drawing pack earns its keep. Its dominant postwar (1945–1970) housing stock sets the design brief on most streets.
Before permission is required, Class B allows 40m³ of added loft volume on a terrace and 50m³ on a semi or detached house, and Class A allows a 3m single-storey rear extension on a terrace or 4m on a detached house. Hart carries at least one Article 4 direction, and conservation areas including Basingstoke Canal 1, Basingstoke Canal2 and Basingstoke Canal3 remove those rights outright, so we confirm your exact address before a line is drawn. A validated householder application in Hart is determined against an 8-week statutory target.
Basingstoke Canal 1 (conservation area designated in 2009), Basingstoke Canal2 (conservation area designated in 2009), Basingstoke Canal3 (conservation area designated in 2009), Basingstoke Canal4 (conservation area designated in 2009), Basingstoke Canal5 (conservation area designated in 2009), Bramshill (conservation area designated in 2012), Cricket Hill (conservation area designated in 2011), Crondall (conservation area designated in 2024), Blackwater and Hawley (ward of Hart), Fleet Central (ward of Hart), Fleet East (ward of Hart), Fleet West (ward of Hart), Hartley Wintney (ward of Hart), Odiham (ward of Hart) and Yateley East (ward of Hart) — these are the Hart pockets our drawings cover most. Heritage designations here include Basingstoke Canal 1, Basingstoke Canal2, Basingstoke Canal3, Basingstoke Canal4, Basingstoke Canal5, Bramshill, Cricket Hill and Crondall. Hart District Council weighs each proposal against Hart District Council's development plan and the design policies it applies to householder applications, where the 26,660 homes here are 15% 1965-1972, 11% 1955-1964, 10% 1983-1992, which is what sets the realistic roof and rear-projection options. On roofs the borough is shallow-pitched roofs and integral garages typical of that period's building and shallow gabled roofs typical of that period's building, over late-1960s and early-1970s houses (15% of 26,660 homes), late-1950s and early-1960s houses (11%) and 1980s estate houses (10%).
What is permitted in Hart turns on designation first, so that is where we start: Basingstoke Canal 1 (conservation area designated in 2009), Basingstoke Canal2 (conservation area designated in 2009), Basingstoke Canal3 (conservation area designated in 2009), Basingstoke Canal4 (conservation area designated in 2009), Basingstoke Canal5 (conservation area designated in 2009), Bramshill (conservation area designated in 2012), Cricket Hill (conservation area designated in 2011) and Crondall (conservation area designated in 2024). Inside those boundaries permitted development is curtailed and Hart District Council assesses materials, window detail and roof form against the area's own appraisal, so a scheme that would be waved through two streets away can need a full application here.
Beyond the designated areas, Hart takes in Blackwater and Hawley, Fleet Central, Fleet East, Fleet West, Hartley Wintney, Odiham and Yateley East. Hart District Council has 47 recorded Article 4 directions — check the address before assuming PD applies in the district.
On stock, Hart is late-1960s and early-1970s houses (15% of 26,660 homes), late-1950s and early-1960s houses (11%) and 1980s estate houses (10%) — which is why shallow-pitched roofs and integral garages typical of that period's building and shallow gabled roofs typical of that period's building govern what a loft or rear projection can realistically be. Hart District Council decided 445 householder applications in the latest published year and granted 86%, with 71% issued inside the eight-week target. We draw to that record rather than to a national average.
The full build-period split for Hart runs pre-1900 3% (190 homes), 1900-1918 0% (30 homes), 1919-1929 0% (10 homes), 1930-1939 6% (350 homes), 1945-1954 3% (170 homes), 1955-1964 30% (1,850 homes), 1965-1972 33% (1,990 homes), 1973-1982 4% (260 homes), 1983-1992 5% (310 homes), 1993-1999 4% (220 homes) and 2000-2008 3% (170 homes). That distribution is why pre-1900 detailing dominates the drawings here, and it is measured from council-tax records rather than assumed from the street name.
Hart District Council also decides for Blackwater and Hawley, Fleet Central, Fleet East, Fleet West, Hartley Wintney, Odiham and Yateley East, so a decision in Hart sits inside a wider pattern of decisions we track across the same authority — useful when an officer cites a precedent from the next area over.
The Article 4 directions recorded for this council include Bramshill, Broad Oak Odiham Hampshire., Church Farm (Eversley) and Cricket Hill Yateley (Extension). Each removes a specific permitted-development right inside its own boundary, which is why the check is done on the address rather than on the town.
Published figures for Hart and Hart District Council. These are the numbers that decide what is realistic on your street, so we work from them rather than from national averages.
| Measure | Hart |
|---|---|
| Dwellings recorded | 26,660 |
| Built pre-1900 | 190 (3%) |
| Built 1900-1918 | 30 (0%) |
| Built 1919-1929 | 10 (0%) |
| Built 1930-1939 | 350 (6%) |
| Built 1945-1954 | 170 (3%) |
| Built 1955-1964 | 1,850 (30%) |
| Built 1965-1972 | 1,990 (33%) |
| Built 1973-1982 | 260 (4%) |
| Built 1983-1992 | 310 (5%) |
| Built 1993-1999 | 220 (4%) |
| Built 2000-2008 | 170 (3%) |
| Built before 1919 | 11% |
| Built 1919–1939 | 5% |
| Built 1945–2008 | 69% |
| Conservation areas in Hart | 8 (Basingstoke Canal 1, Basingstoke Canal2…) |
| Conservation areas district-wide | 39 |
| Article 4 directions recorded | 47 |
| Householder applications decided | 445 |
| Householder applications granted | 86% |
| Decided within 8 weeks | 71% |
Dwelling stock from VOA council-tax data at 31 March 2025; conservation-area and Article 4 counts from planning.data.gov.uk (MHCLG); decision figures are Hart District Council's own, from MHCLG live table PS2 for the year to 31 March 2026.
Whatever you are building, Hart District Council decides it from the same core set. A location plan at 1:1250 fixes the site on the map with the red-line boundary; a block plan at 1:500 shows the property in its plot; then existing and proposed floor plans and elevations at 1:100 or 1:50 show the house as it is and as it will be. Larger schemes add a section and, where policy requires, a design and access statement. Miss one and the application is returned invalid before an officer has looked at it.
The drawings are also the argument. Hart District Council assesses each proposal against Hart District Council's development plan and the design policies it applies to householder applications, and the elevations are where the case is won or lost — ridge and eaves heights, window positions, materials and how the change reads from the street. On Hart's stock, which runs to late-1960s and early-1970s houses (15% of 26,660 homes), late-1950s and early-1960s houses (11%) and 1980s estate houses (10%), the same scheme is drawn differently to answer the concerns officers raise here. Hart contains Basingstoke Canal 1, Basingstoke Canal2, Basingstoke Canal3 conservation areas (Basingstoke Canal 1 designated 2009), so materials, fenestration and roof form are assessed against the appraisal, so the pack is built to pre-empt exactly that.
Where the property sits in a conservation area — Basingstoke Canal 1, Basingstoke Canal2, Basingstoke Canal3, Basingstoke Canal4, Basingstoke Canal5, Bramshill, Cricket Hill and Crondall among Hart's — validation is stricter still, often demanding heritage detail and sometimes additional plans. Hart District Council has 47 recorded Article 4 directions — check the address before assuming PD applies in the district. We confirm the designation before drawing so the pack meets the higher bar first time.
Hart District Council validates against a published checklist before it assesses anything. A typical householder application needs each of these, correctly scaled and labelled:
We draw the complete set — location and block plans, existing and proposed plans, elevations and any section — to Hart District Council's checklist, then lodge it on the Planning Portal, manage validation and answer case-officer queries so the application is decided on its merits, not bounced on a technicality.
Below is Hart District Council's real householder decision record, drawn from official planning statistics and refreshed as new data lands. Hart District Council granted 86% of 445 householder decisions in the year to 31 March 2026, 71% of them inside eight weeks. A complete, correctly scaled pack that answers those concerns on the elevations is validated faster and refused less often than one that leaves them for the officer to raise.
Source: MHCLG planning application statistics (householder decisions, England, 1 April 2025 - 31 March 2026). Compare every borough on our London approval-rate league table.
Tell us about your project and get a fixed, no-obligation quote back within one working day. If you don't need planning permission at all, we'll tell you that too — for free.
Two different things sink an application, and they happen at two different stages. First is validation: a missing block plan, an unscaled elevation, no red line, no north point — Hart District Council returns the whole submission and the clock never starts. Getting the pack right at this stage is purely mechanical, and it is where a lot of self-submitted Hart applications lose weeks. We draw to the checklist so this never happens.
Second is the planning judgement itself, once the pack is valid. The 26,660 homes here are 15% 1965-1972, 11% 1955-1964, 10% 1983-1992, which is what sets the realistic roof and rear-projection options. Across Basingstoke Canal 1, Basingstoke Canal2 and Basingstoke Canal3 the recurring refusals are about scale, overlooking and how the proposal sits against its neighbours — all of which are settled on the drawings. We draw the scheme to answer them before submission rather than after a refusal.
The application pack is the same discipline whatever the project. A few of the Hart neighbourhoods and property types we prepare drawings for most often:
Planning drawings for Basingstoke Canal 1's conservation area designated in 2009 — scaled, validation-ready and drawn to Hart District Council's guidance.
Planning drawings for Basingstoke Canal2's conservation area designated in 2009 — scaled, validation-ready and drawn to Hart District Council's guidance.
Planning drawings for Basingstoke Canal3's conservation area designated in 2009 — scaled, validation-ready and drawn to Hart District Council's guidance.
Planning drawings for Basingstoke Canal4's conservation area designated in 2009 — scaled, validation-ready and drawn to Hart District Council's guidance.
Planning drawings for Basingstoke Canal5's conservation area designated in 2009 — scaled, validation-ready and drawn to Hart District Council's guidance.
Planning drawings for Bramshill's conservation area designated in 2012 — scaled, validation-ready and drawn to Hart District Council's guidance.
The route decides what Hart District Council needs and how long it takes. This is how the common Hart routes compare.
| Route | When it applies | Core drawings | Typical decision |
|---|---|---|---|
| Householder application | Extensions and alterations to a single house | Location, block, existing & proposed plans and elevations | About 8 weeks |
| Full application | Flats, new units, changes of use | As householder plus site plan and often a section | 8–13 weeks |
| Lawful development certificate | Confirming a scheme is permitted development | Existing & proposed plans and elevations to prove PD limits | About 8 weeks |
| Prior approval | Larger single-storey rear extensions | Plans and elevations plus neighbour notification | About 6 weeks |
In a conservation area such as Basingstoke Canal 1 and Basingstoke Canal2, householder permitted-development rights are often restricted, so a full application and heritage detail may be required.
A fixed process built around how Hart District Council validates and decides — most drawing sets are submission-ready within seven days of survey.
Send us your Hart postcode and what you want to build. We confirm your conservation and Article 4 status, tell you which application route applies, and score your odds against live Hart District Council decisions.
We measure the property and plot so the existing plans and elevations are accurate to the millimetre — the base every proposed drawing and every officer judgement is built on.
Chartered designers produce the full validation pack — location and block plans, existing and proposed plans, elevations, any section and a design and access statement — drawn to Hart District Council's checklist.
We lodge the application on the Planning Portal, manage validation and case-officer queries, and revise the drawings free until Hart District Council issues its decision.
Hart District Council validates a householder application against a set list: a location plan at 1:1250 with a red-line boundary, a block plan at 1:500, and existing and proposed floor plans and elevations at 1:100 or 1:50, each with a scale bar and north point. Larger schemes and most conservation-area work also need a design and access statement. If any of these is missing or unscaled the application is returned invalid before it is assessed.
Almost always because the drawing pack is incomplete or wrongly scaled — a missing block plan, an elevation with no scale, no red line on the location plan, no north point. Hart District Council checks the pack against its validation list before an officer ever assesses the scheme, so these purely technical gaps cost weeks. Drawing to the checklist from the outset is the simplest way to avoid a return.
Yes. We prepare the full drawing set, lodge it on the Planning Portal on your behalf, pay the Hart District Council fee where you prefer us to, and then manage validation and case-officer questions through to the decision. You get the reference number and updates without dealing with the portal or the council yourself.
A householder application is a statutory eight weeks from validation, and a full application eight to thirteen weeks depending on scale. The date that matters is validation, not submission — an invalid pack never starts the clock. Because we draw to Hart District Council's checklist the application validates quickly, so the statutory period begins without the delay a returned pack causes.
You do not strictly need a planning application, but scaled existing and proposed drawings are still worth having: a lawful development certificate from Hart District Council proves the scheme is permitted development, which lenders and buyers increasingly ask for, and your builder needs the drawings to price and build. In a conservation area such as Basingstoke Canal 1 and Basingstoke Canal2, permitted-development rights are often removed, so a full application may be needed after all — we confirm which before you commit.
We price each Hart job individually — the scope of the survey and the size of the drawing set vary from a simple rear extension to a whole-house scheme — and send a fixed, no-obligation quote within one working day. It covers the full validation pack with free revisions until Hart District Council decides. The Hart District Council application fee is separate and paid to the council. Call 020 7864 7245 to start.
Answer five quick questions and get a free planning score for your exact address — instantly. Then, if you want the full picture, unlock the detailed analysis: your council's live approval rates, local precedents, constraints on your street and a step-by-step route to permission.
Same fixed quotes, same fast drawings — wherever your project is.