The fast route to a deep single-storey rear extension in Hart — up to 6 metres on an attached house or 8 on a detached one — via Hart District Council's prior approval scheme rather than a full planning application.
Hart District Council granted 86% of the householder planning decisions it made in its latest published year — 1 point below the 87% England-wide householder average. Hart contains Basingstoke Canal 1, Basingstoke Canal2, Basingstoke Canal3 conservation areas (Basingstoke Canal 1 designated 2009), so materials, fenestration and roof form are assessed against the appraisal, which is where a policy-literate drawing pack earns its keep. Its dominant postwar (1945–1970) housing stock sets the design brief on most streets.
Before permission is required, Class B allows 40m³ of added loft volume on a terrace and 50m³ on a semi or detached house, and Class A allows a 3m single-storey rear extension on a terrace or 4m on a detached house. Hart carries at least one Article 4 direction, and conservation areas including Basingstoke Canal 1, Basingstoke Canal2 and Basingstoke Canal3 remove those rights outright, so we confirm your exact address before a line is drawn. A validated householder application in Hart is determined against an 8-week statutory target.
Basingstoke Canal 1 (conservation area designated in 2009), Basingstoke Canal2 (conservation area designated in 2009), Basingstoke Canal3 (conservation area designated in 2009), Basingstoke Canal4 (conservation area designated in 2009), Basingstoke Canal5 (conservation area designated in 2009), Bramshill (conservation area designated in 2012), Cricket Hill (conservation area designated in 2011), Crondall (conservation area designated in 2024), Blackwater and Hawley (ward of Hart), Fleet Central (ward of Hart), Fleet East (ward of Hart), Fleet West (ward of Hart), Hartley Wintney (ward of Hart), Odiham (ward of Hart) and Yateley East (ward of Hart) — these are the Hart pockets our drawings cover most. Heritage designations here include Basingstoke Canal 1, Basingstoke Canal2, Basingstoke Canal3, Basingstoke Canal4, Basingstoke Canal5, Bramshill, Cricket Hill and Crondall. Hart District Council weighs each proposal against Hart District Council's development plan and the design policies it applies to householder applications, where the 26,660 homes here are 15% 1965-1972, 11% 1955-1964, 10% 1983-1992, which is what sets the realistic roof and rear-projection options. On roofs the borough is shallow-pitched roofs and integral garages typical of that period's building and shallow gabled roofs typical of that period's building, over late-1960s and early-1970s houses (15% of 26,660 homes), late-1950s and early-1960s houses (11%) and 1980s estate houses (10%).
What is permitted in Hart turns on designation first, so that is where we start: Basingstoke Canal 1 (conservation area designated in 2009), Basingstoke Canal2 (conservation area designated in 2009), Basingstoke Canal3 (conservation area designated in 2009), Basingstoke Canal4 (conservation area designated in 2009), Basingstoke Canal5 (conservation area designated in 2009), Bramshill (conservation area designated in 2012), Cricket Hill (conservation area designated in 2011) and Crondall (conservation area designated in 2024). Inside those boundaries permitted development is curtailed and Hart District Council assesses materials, window detail and roof form against the area's own appraisal, so a scheme that would be waved through two streets away can need a full application here.
Beyond the designated areas, Hart takes in Blackwater and Hawley, Fleet Central, Fleet East, Fleet West, Hartley Wintney, Odiham and Yateley East. Hart District Council has 47 recorded Article 4 directions — check the address before assuming PD applies in the district.
On stock, Hart is late-1960s and early-1970s houses (15% of 26,660 homes), late-1950s and early-1960s houses (11%) and 1980s estate houses (10%) — which is why shallow-pitched roofs and integral garages typical of that period's building and shallow gabled roofs typical of that period's building govern what a loft or rear projection can realistically be. Hart District Council decided 445 householder applications in the latest published year and granted 86%, with 71% issued inside the eight-week target. We draw to that record rather than to a national average.
The full build-period split for Hart runs pre-1900 3% (190 homes), 1900-1918 0% (30 homes), 1919-1929 0% (10 homes), 1930-1939 6% (350 homes), 1945-1954 3% (170 homes), 1955-1964 30% (1,850 homes), 1965-1972 33% (1,990 homes), 1973-1982 4% (260 homes), 1983-1992 5% (310 homes), 1993-1999 4% (220 homes) and 2000-2008 3% (170 homes). That distribution is why pre-1900 detailing dominates the drawings here, and it is measured from council-tax records rather than assumed from the street name.
Hart District Council also decides for Blackwater and Hawley, Fleet Central, Fleet East, Fleet West, Hartley Wintney, Odiham and Yateley East, so a decision in Hart sits inside a wider pattern of decisions we track across the same authority — useful when an officer cites a precedent from the next area over.
The Article 4 directions recorded for this council include Bramshill, Broad Oak Odiham Hampshire., Church Farm (Eversley) and Cricket Hill Yateley (Extension). Each removes a specific permitted-development right inside its own boundary, which is why the check is done on the address rather than on the town.
Published figures for Hart and Hart District Council. These are the numbers that decide what is realistic on your street, so we work from them rather than from national averages.
| Measure | Hart |
|---|---|
| Dwellings recorded | 26,660 |
| Built pre-1900 | 190 (3%) |
| Built 1900-1918 | 30 (0%) |
| Built 1919-1929 | 10 (0%) |
| Built 1930-1939 | 350 (6%) |
| Built 1945-1954 | 170 (3%) |
| Built 1955-1964 | 1,850 (30%) |
| Built 1965-1972 | 1,990 (33%) |
| Built 1973-1982 | 260 (4%) |
| Built 1983-1992 | 310 (5%) |
| Built 1993-1999 | 220 (4%) |
| Built 2000-2008 | 170 (3%) |
| Built before 1919 | 11% |
| Built 1919–1939 | 5% |
| Built 1945–2008 | 69% |
| Conservation areas in Hart | 8 (Basingstoke Canal 1, Basingstoke Canal2…) |
| Conservation areas district-wide | 39 |
| Article 4 directions recorded | 47 |
| Householder applications decided | 445 |
| Householder applications granted | 86% |
| Decided within 8 weeks | 71% |
Dwelling stock from VOA council-tax data at 31 March 2025; conservation-area and Article 4 counts from planning.data.gov.uk (MHCLG); decision figures are Hart District Council's own, from MHCLG live table PS2 for the year to 31 March 2026.
The ordinary Class A limits stop a single-storey rear extension at 3 metres on an attached house and 4 on a detached one. The larger home extension scheme doubles both, on condition that the council is told first. That notification is not an application for permission — the council cannot refuse on design, materials or policy grounds. It can only consider the effect on the amenity of adjoining premises, and only if a neighbour actually objects during the 21-day consultation.
The other conditions still apply and are strict: single storey only, no higher than 4 metres, eaves no higher than the existing eaves, and no more than half the land around the original house covered. It is not available on designated land, so a house in a conservation area such as Basingstoke Canal 1 and Basingstoke Canal2 cannot use it at all. Materials must be similar to the existing house, and the extension must not include a veranda, balcony or raised platform.
Hart is largely late-1960s and early-1970s houses (15% of 26,660 homes), late-1950s and early-1960s houses (11%) and 1980s estate houses (10%). Hart contains Basingstoke Canal 1, Basingstoke Canal2, Basingstoke Canal3 conservation areas (Basingstoke Canal 1 designated 2009), so materials, fenestration and roof form are assessed against the appraisal, which matters here because an objecting neighbour puts amenity squarely in front of a case officer. Hart District Council has 47 recorded Article 4 directions — check the address before assuming PD applies in the district.
The scheme is available where all of these hold. Fail any one and it is a full application to Hart District Council instead:
We prepare the notification pack Hart District Council needs — plans, elevations, a site plan with the adjoining owners identified — and manage the 21-day neighbour consultation so the 42-day clock is not restarted by an incomplete submission.
Below is Hart District Council's real householder decision record, drawn from official planning statistics and refreshed as new data lands. Hart District Council granted 86% of 445 householder decisions in the year to 31 March 2026, 71% of them inside eight weeks. Prior approval turns on neighbour amenity alone, so the drawings that matter are the ones showing the relationship to the boundary.
Source: MHCLG planning application statistics (householder decisions, England, 1 April 2025 - 31 March 2026). Compare every borough on our London approval-rate league table.
Tell us about your project and get a fixed, no-obligation quote back within one working day. If you don't need planning permission at all, we'll tell you that too — for free.
Across Basingstoke Canal 1, Basingstoke Canal2 and Basingstoke Canal3, the notifications that clear without objection are the ones that treat the neighbour as the audience. We show the extension in section against the boundary, demonstrate the 45-degree daylight relationship to the nearest habitable window, and where the plot is tight we taper the depth away from the boundary rather than running the full 6 metres to the fence.
The 26,660 homes here are 15% 1965-1972, 11% 1955-1964, 10% 1983-1992, which is what sets the realistic roof and rear-projection options. Where an objection does arrive, the council's assessment is narrow: loss of light, outlook and overbearing effect on the adjoining property, nothing else. A pack that has already answered those three points on the drawings usually survives an objection, whereas one that leaves them to the officer's imagination usually does not.
We prepare prior-approval notifications across Hart. A few of the areas where deep rear extensions come up most often:
Prior approval drawings for Basingstoke Canal 1 — conservation area designated in 2009 — dimensioned to the 6m and 8m limits and prepared for Hart District Council's neighbour consultation.
Prior approval drawings for Basingstoke Canal2 — conservation area designated in 2009 — dimensioned to the 6m and 8m limits and prepared for Hart District Council's neighbour consultation.
Prior approval drawings for Basingstoke Canal3 — conservation area designated in 2009 — dimensioned to the 6m and 8m limits and prepared for Hart District Council's neighbour consultation.
Prior approval drawings for Basingstoke Canal4 — conservation area designated in 2009 — dimensioned to the 6m and 8m limits and prepared for Hart District Council's neighbour consultation.
Prior approval drawings for Basingstoke Canal5 — conservation area designated in 2009 — dimensioned to the 6m and 8m limits and prepared for Hart District Council's neighbour consultation.
Prior approval drawings for Bramshill — conservation area designated in 2012 — dimensioned to the 6m and 8m limits and prepared for Hart District Council's neighbour consultation.
Same extension, two routes, very different tests.
| Route | Depth allowed | What the council may consider | Timescale |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ordinary Class A permitted development | 3m attached / 4m detached | Nothing — no application needed | Immediate |
| Larger home extension prior approval | 6m attached / 8m detached | Amenity of adjoining premises, only if a neighbour objects | 21-day consultation, 42-day determination |
| Full householder application | No fixed limit | Design, materials, policy, amenity, everything | 8-week target |
| Any of these on designated land | 3m / 4m only | Prior approval scheme unavailable | Full application beyond the limits |
Limits and procedure from the GPDO 2015, Schedule 2, Part 1, Class A and paragraph A.4, made permanent by amendment in 2019.
A process built around the 21-day consultation, which is where these schemes are won or lost.
Send us your Hart postcode and house type. We confirm whether the property is on designated land, whether the scheme is available, and what depth you can realistically take.
We measure the original rear wall, eaves height, boundary distances and the neighbouring windows that the amenity assessment will turn on.
We draw the extension to the 6m or 8m limit with the boundary relationship shown in section, and prepare the written description and adjoining-owner details Hart District Council needs to start the consultation.
We submit, track the 21-day consultation and the 42-day determination, respond to any objection on amenity grounds, and revise free until the decision.
Three metres on a terraced or semi-detached house and four on a detached one under ordinary permitted development. Under the larger home extension prior approval scheme those double to six and eight metres, provided you notify Hart District Council before starting and the conditions on height, materials and land coverage are met. The scheme is not available on designated land.
It is a notification, not an application for permission. You tell Hart District Council what you intend to build, it writes to the adjoining owners, and they have 21 days to object. If nobody objects, you may build. If someone does, the council assesses the effect on the amenity of adjoining premises and must decide within 42 days. Design and policy are not in scope.
The council then considers the impact on the amenity of the adjoining property — loss of light, loss of outlook, and overbearing effect — and nothing else. It cannot refuse because it dislikes the design or the materials. We prepare the drawings so those three questions are already answered in section and on the site plan, which is what usually carries an objected scheme through. This applies to your Hart address specifically. Hart District Council is the decision-maker.
No. The larger home extension scheme is unavailable on designated land, which includes conservation areas such as Basingstoke Canal 1 and Basingstoke Canal2, national landscapes, national parks and world heritage sites. On those properties the ordinary 3-metre and 4-metre limits apply, and anything deeper needs a full householder application to Hart District Council.
Twenty-one days for the neighbour consultation, and a maximum of 42 days from a valid submission for the council to determine it. If the council does not respond within 42 days you may proceed as notified. That deadline is the scheme's real advantage over a full application, and it is why validation completeness matters so much. This applies to your Hart address specifically. Hart District Council is the decision-maker.
Yes — always. Prior approval deals only with the planning position. A 6-metre rear extension still needs building control approval for foundations, structure, drainage, thermal performance and fire safety, and the beam over the opening into the existing house needs designing and calculating. We prepare both sets so the notified scheme is the buildable one. This applies to your Hart address specifically. Hart District Council is the decision-maker.
We quote each Hart scheme individually, because plot shape and the boundary relationship drive the work, and send a fixed, no-obligation quote within one working day. It covers the notification pack and free revisions until Hart District Council determines it. Call 020 7864 7245 to start.
Answer five quick questions and get a free planning score for your exact address — instantly. Then, if you want the full picture, unlock the detailed analysis: your council's live approval rates, local precedents, constraints on your street and a step-by-step route to permission.
Same fixed quotes, same fast drawings — wherever your project is.