Side-return infill drawings for Nevile & Langar terraces — the glazed extension that fills the redundant side alley and opens up the kitchen, drawn to Rushcliffe Borough Council's guidance, delivered in days and revised free until your decision, with a free approval-odds check first.
Rushcliffe Borough Council granted 95% of the householder planning decisions it made in its latest published year — 8 points above the 87% England-wide householder average. Nevile & Langar contains Colston Bassett, Hickling, Langar conservation areas (Hickling designated 1990), so materials, fenestration and roof form are assessed against the appraisal, which is where a policy-literate drawing pack earns its keep. Its dominant Victorian (1837–1901) and postwar (1945–1970) housing stock sets the design brief on most streets.
Before permission is required, Class B allows 40m³ of added loft volume on a terrace and 50m³ on a semi or detached house, and Class A allows a 3m single-storey rear extension on a terrace or 4m on a detached house. In conservation areas such as Colston Bassett, Hickling and Langar those rights are removed, so we confirm your exact address before a line is drawn. A validated householder application in Nevile & Langar is determined against an 8-week statutory target.
Colston Bassett (designated conservation area), Hickling (conservation area designated in 1990), Langar (conservation area designated in 1990), Upper Broughton (designated conservation area), Kinoulton (civil parish within Nevile & Langar), Langar cum Barnstone (civil parish within Nevile & Langar), Upper Broughton (civil parish within Nevile & Langar), Colston Bassett (civil parish within Nevile & Langar) and Hickling (civil parish within Nevile & Langar) — these are the Nevile & Langar pockets our drawings cover most. Heritage designations here include Colston Bassett, Hickling, Langar and Upper Broughton. Rushcliffe Borough Council weighs each proposal against the adopted Rushcliffe local plan and Rushcliffe Borough Council's design guidance for householder work, where the 1,430 homes here are 24% pre-1900, 17% 1973-1982, 11% 1965-1972, which is what sets the realistic roof and rear-projection options. On roofs the borough is steeply pitched slate roofs, valley gutters and party parapets typical of pre-1900 building and shallow trussed roofs typical of 1970s building, over Victorian and earlier houses (24% of 1,430 homes), 1970s and early-1980s houses (17%) and late-1960s and early-1970s houses (11%).
What is permitted in Nevile & Langar turns on designation first, so that is where we start: Colston Bassett (designated conservation area), Hickling (conservation area designated in 1990), Langar (conservation area designated in 1990) and Upper Broughton (designated conservation area). Inside those boundaries permitted development is curtailed and Rushcliffe Borough Council assesses materials, window detail and roof form against the area's own appraisal, so a scheme that would be waved through two streets away can need a full application here.
Beyond the designated areas, Nevile & Langar takes in Kinoulton, Langar cum Barnstone, Upper Broughton, Colston Bassett and Hickling. No Article 4 direction is recorded for Rushcliffe Borough Council, but Nevile & Langar's 4 conservation areas still limit permitted development on those streets.
On stock, Nevile & Langar is Victorian and earlier houses (24% of 1,430 homes), 1970s and early-1980s houses (17%) and late-1960s and early-1970s houses (11%) — which is why steeply pitched slate roofs, valley gutters and party parapets typical of pre-1900 building and shallow trussed roofs typical of 1970s building govern what a loft or rear projection can realistically be. Rushcliffe Borough Council decided 476 householder applications in the latest published year and granted 95%, with 51% issued inside the eight-week target. We draw to that record rather than to a national average.
The full build-period split for Nevile & Langar runs pre-1900 24% (350 homes), 1900-1918 2% (30 homes), 1919-1929 1% (20 homes), 1930-1939 3% (40 homes), 1945-1954 3% (50 homes), 1955-1964 6% (80 homes), 1965-1972 11% (160 homes), 1973-1982 17% (240 homes), 1983-1992 6% (80 homes), 1993-1999 7% (100 homes) and 2000-2008 6% (90 homes). That distribution is why pre-1900 detailing dominates the drawings here, and it is measured from council-tax records rather than assumed from the street name.
Rushcliffe Borough Council also decides for Bingham North, Bunny, Cotgrave, Cranmer, Cropwell, East Bridgford, Gotham and Keyworth & Wolds, so a decision in Nevile & Langar sits inside a wider pattern of decisions we track across the same authority — useful when an officer cites a precedent from the next area over.
Published figures for Nevile & Langar and Rushcliffe Borough Council. These are the numbers that decide what is realistic on your street, so we work from them rather than from national averages.
| Measure | Nevile & Langar |
|---|---|
| Dwellings recorded | 1,430 |
| Built pre-1900 | 350 (24%) |
| Built 1900-1918 | 30 (2%) |
| Built 1919-1929 | 20 (1%) |
| Built 1930-1939 | 40 (3%) |
| Built 1945-1954 | 50 (3%) |
| Built 1955-1964 | 80 (6%) |
| Built 1965-1972 | 160 (11%) |
| Built 1973-1982 | 240 (17%) |
| Built 1983-1992 | 80 (6%) |
| Built 1993-1999 | 100 (7%) |
| Built 2000-2008 | 90 (6%) |
| Built before 1919 | 27% |
| Built 1919–1939 | 4% |
| Built 1945–2008 | 56% |
| Conservation areas in Nevile & Langar | 4 (Colston Bassett, Hickling…) |
| Conservation areas district-wide | 32 |
| Article 4 directions recorded | 0 |
| Householder applications decided | 476 |
| Householder applications granted | 95% |
| Decided within 8 weeks | 51% |
Dwelling stock from VOA council-tax data at 31 March 2025; conservation-area and Article 4 counts from planning.data.gov.uk (MHCLG); decision figures are Rushcliffe Borough Council's own, from MHCLG live table PS2 for the year to 31 March 2026.
The side return is the classic terrace fix, and Nevile & Langar has the stock for it — the borough is built largely from Victorian and earlier houses (24% of 1,430 homes), 1970s and early-1980s houses (17%) and late-1960s and early-1970s houses (11%), and the Victorian and Edwardian versions almost all have an L-shaped back addition with a wasted alley beside it. Fill that alley and the dark galley kitchen becomes a bright, square room the full width of the house. Rushcliffe Borough Council judges the infill against the adopted Rushcliffe local plan and Rushcliffe Borough Council's design guidance for householder work, and because it runs along the party boundary, the neighbour relationship is read before the design.
That boundary is where the drawings earn their keep. We set the infill wall on or up to the line, keep the roof — usually a glazed lantern or a shallow pitch tying into the existing back-addition slope — below the neighbour's first-floor windows, and detail the rainwater and party-wall junction so the build is watertight and the Party Wall Act is satisfied. Nevile & Langar contains Colston Bassett, Hickling, Langar conservation areas (Hickling designated 1990), so materials, fenestration and roof form are assessed against the appraisal, so we resolve it on the section rather than leave it to the case officer.
Many of Nevile & Langar's terraces sit in conservation areas — Colston Bassett, Hickling, Langar and Upper Broughton among them — where a side extension is no longer permitted development. No Article 4 direction is recorded for Rushcliffe Borough Council, but Nevile & Langar's 4 conservation areas still limit permitted development on those streets. We confirm the designation before a line is drawn.
Some single-storey side returns in Nevile & Langar are permitted development, but the width and boundary make an application more likely than for a straight rear extension. You will normally need to apply to Rushcliffe Borough Council if any of these apply:
We draw the infill wall on the boundary, the glazed roof below the neighbour's windows and the party-wall junction on the page — the details Rushcliffe Borough Council's officers and your neighbour both check — and submit a validation-complete pack, whether that is a lawful development certificate or a full householder application.
Below is Rushcliffe Borough Council's real householder decision record, drawn from official planning statistics and refreshed as new data lands. Rushcliffe Borough Council granted 95% of its householder applications in the year to 31 March 2026, and Colston Bassett shapes what is approved here. Side returns hinge on width, roof glazing and the party boundary, so a pack that resolves those details upfront is decided faster and refused less often than a DIY submission.
Source: MHCLG planning application statistics (householder decisions, England, 1 April 2025 - 31 March 2026). Compare every borough on our London approval-rate league table.
Tell us about your project and get a fixed, no-obligation quote back within one working day. If you don't need planning permission at all, we'll tell you that too — for free.
Across Colston Bassett, Hickling and Langar, the approved side return is a single-storey infill roofed with a glazed lantern or roof light to pull daylight deep into the plan, its flank wall built on the boundary and finished to match the host brick. On the borough's victorian and earlier houses (24% of 1,430 homes), this is frequently the single biggest gain in usable ground-floor space, and where it stays within the width and height limits it can proceed under permitted development or a lawful development certificate.
The 1,430 homes here are 24% pre-1900, 17% 1973-1982, 11% 1965-1972, which is what sets the realistic roof and rear-projection options. We keep the glazed roof below the neighbour's cill line, set the gutter and the party-wall flashing so water and maintenance are designed in, and — where owners want the full open-plan room — pair the infill with a rear extension as a single wraparound application. That way Rushcliffe Borough Council sees one coherent scheme rather than two overlapping ones.
We draw side-return infills on every terraced street in the borough. A few of the neighbourhoods where Nevile & Langar side returns come up most often:
Side return extension drawings for Colston Bassett's designated conservation area — width-checked, party-wall detailed and drawn to Rushcliffe Borough Council's guidance.
Side return extension drawings for Hickling's conservation area designated in 1990 — width-checked, party-wall detailed and drawn to Rushcliffe Borough Council's guidance.
Side return extension drawings for Langar's conservation area designated in 1990 — width-checked, party-wall detailed and drawn to Rushcliffe Borough Council's guidance.
Side return extension drawings for Upper Broughton's designated conservation area — width-checked, party-wall detailed and drawn to Rushcliffe Borough Council's guidance.
Side return extension drawings for Kinoulton's civil parish within Nevile & Langar — width-checked, party-wall detailed and drawn to Rushcliffe Borough Council's guidance.
Side return extension drawings for Langar cum Barnstone's civil parish within Nevile & Langar — width-checked, party-wall detailed and drawn to Rushcliffe Borough Council's guidance.
Whether a side return in Nevile & Langar needs permission comes down to width, storeys and whether the street is designated. This is how the cases compare.
| Side return type | Permitted development? | What it gains | What Rushcliffe Borough Council checks |
|---|---|---|---|
| Single-storey infill, within limits | Often yes, if under half the house width | Full-width kitchen-diner | Width, 4m height, roof glazing |
| Single-storey, over half width | No — full application | Wider room, more light | Boundary treatment, neighbour amenity |
| Two-storey side return | No — full application | Room above as well as below | Bulk, overlooking, terrace rhythm |
| Wraparound (side + rear) | No — full application | L-shaped open-plan ground floor | Combined footprint, garden retained |
In conservation areas such as Colston Bassett and Hickling, side extensions are not permitted development and always need a full application.
A fixed process built around how Rushcliffe Borough Council validates and decides side-return applications — most drawings are submission-ready within seven days of survey.
Send us your Nevile & Langar postcode and terrace type. We confirm your conservation and Article 4 status, whether the infill stays within the side-extension width limit, and score your odds against live Rushcliffe Borough Council decisions.
We measure the side alley, the back-addition wall, floor and eaves levels and the neighbour's window heights — the numbers the width limit, roof pitch and party-wall detailing depend on.
Chartered designers develop the infill and its glazed roof to your brief, drawn inside the permitted-development limits or to Rushcliffe Borough Council's extension guidance, with the boundary and party-wall junction detailed.
We submit the certificate or application, manage validation and case-officer queries, and revise the drawings free until Rushcliffe Borough Council issues its decision.
Sometimes not. A single-storey side-return infill can be permitted development if it is no wider than half the original house, no higher than 4 metres, and the property is not on designated land. In Nevile & Langar you will need a full application to Rushcliffe Borough Council for anything wider or taller, for a two-storey side return, and for any side extension in a conservation area such as Colston Bassett and Hickling, where those rights are removed.
It is an infill that fills the narrow open alley running alongside the rear back-addition of a Victorian or Edwardian terrace — the strip of ground that is usually too small to use. Building over it squares off the ground floor, so a cramped galley kitchen becomes a full-width room. Nevile & Langar's period terraces are ideally suited to it, which is why the side return is one of the borough's most common extensions. Rushcliffe Borough Council is the decision-maker.
Almost always. A side return is built on or up to the boundary with your neighbour, so the Party Wall etc. Act applies and you must serve notice before work starts — this is entirely separate from Rushcliffe Borough Council's planning decision. We detail the party-wall junction on the drawings and flag the notice early so a surveyor can be appointed without delaying the build. This applies to your Nevile & Langar address specifically.
Yes, and it is common — the combined L-shape is a wraparound extension. Once the side infill joins a rear projection beyond the permitted-development depth, the whole thing needs a full householder application to Rushcliffe Borough Council rather than qualifying as permitted development. We draw it as one coherent scheme so the council assesses a single footprint, which reads more clearly than two overlapping proposals. This applies to your Nevile & Langar address specifically.
A householder planning application in Nevile & Langar runs to a statutory eight-week target, and a lawful development certificate to eight weeks as well, though an incomplete pack can stall at validation. Because a side return involves the boundary and roof glazing, a complete, well-detailed submission matters — we prepare it validation-complete and manage officer queries to keep the decision on track. Rushcliffe Borough Council is the decision-maker.
We price each Nevile & Langar side return individually, because alley width and roof form vary house to house, and send a fixed, no-obligation quote within one working day. It covers the full drawing pack with free revisions until Rushcliffe Borough Council approves, and we confirm at the outset whether your infill is permitted development or needs an application. Call 020 7864 7245 to start.
Answer five quick questions and get a free planning score for your exact address — instantly. Then, if you want the full picture, unlock the detailed analysis: your council's live approval rates, local precedents, constraints on your street and a step-by-step route to permission.
Same fixed quotes, same fast drawings — wherever your project is.