Side-return infill drawings for College terraces — the glazed extension that fills the redundant side alley and opens up the kitchen, drawn to Teignbridge District Council's guidance, delivered in days and revised free until your decision, with a free approval-odds check first.
Teignbridge District Council granted 82% of the householder planning decisions it made in its latest published year — 5 points below the 87% England-wide householder average. College contains Forde Park, Newton Abbot, Wolborough Street, Wolborough Hill conservation areas (Forde Park designated 1974), so materials, fenestration and roof form are assessed against the appraisal, which is where a policy-literate drawing pack earns its keep. Its dominant Victorian (1837–1901) and Edwardian (1901–1910) housing stock sets the design brief on most streets.
Before permission is required, Class B allows 40m³ of added loft volume on a terrace and 50m³ on a semi or detached house, and Class A allows a 3m single-storey rear extension on a terrace or 4m on a detached house. In conservation areas such as Forde Park, Newton Abbot, Wolborough Street and Wolborough Hill those rights are removed, so we confirm your exact address before a line is drawn. A validated householder application in College is determined against an 8-week statutory target.
Forde Park (conservation area designated in 1974), Newton Abbot, Wolborough Street (conservation area designated in 2010), Wolborough Hill (designated conservation area), Newton Abbot (civil parish within College) and Ogwell (civil parish within College) — these are the College pockets our drawings cover most. Heritage designations here include Forde Park, Newton Abbot, Wolborough Street and Wolborough Hill. Teignbridge District Council weighs each proposal against Teignbridge District Council's development plan and the design policies it applies to householder applications, where the 2,630 homes here are 46% pre-1900, 12% 1900-1918, 8% 1983-1992, which is what sets the realistic roof and rear-projection options. On roofs the borough is steeply pitched slate roofs, valley gutters and party parapets typical of pre-1900 building and pitched and hipped roofs with generous eaves typical of Edwardian building, over Victorian and earlier houses (46% of 2,630 homes), Edwardian houses (12%) and 1980s estate houses (8%).
What is permitted in College turns on designation first, so that is where we start: Forde Park (conservation area designated in 1974), Newton Abbot, Wolborough Street (conservation area designated in 2010) and Wolborough Hill (designated conservation area). Inside those boundaries permitted development is curtailed and Teignbridge District Council assesses materials, window detail and roof form against the area's own appraisal, so a scheme that would be waved through two streets away can need a full application here.
Beyond the designated areas, College takes in Newton Abbot and Ogwell. No Article 4 direction is recorded for Teignbridge District Council, but College's 3 conservation areas still limit permitted development on those streets.
On stock, College is Victorian and earlier houses (46% of 2,630 homes), Edwardian houses (12%) and 1980s estate houses (8%) — which is why steeply pitched slate roofs, valley gutters and party parapets typical of pre-1900 building and pitched and hipped roofs with generous eaves typical of Edwardian building govern what a loft or rear projection can realistically be. Teignbridge District Council decided 325 householder applications in the latest published year and granted 82%, with 80% issued inside the eight-week target. We draw to that record rather than to a national average.
The full build-period split for College runs pre-1900 46% (1,200 homes), 1900-1918 12% (310 homes), 1919-1929 2% (60 homes), 1930-1939 4% (110 homes), 1945-1954 1% (20 homes), 1955-1964 4% (110 homes), 1965-1972 3% (80 homes), 1973-1982 4% (100 homes), 1983-1992 8% (210 homes), 1993-1999 2% (60 homes) and 2000-2008 4% (100 homes). That distribution is why pre-1900 detailing dominates the drawings here, and it is measured from council-tax records rather than assumed from the street name.
Teignbridge District Council also decides for Ambrook, Bovey, Buckland & Milber, Chudleigh, Dawlish South West, Kenn Valley, Kenton & Starcross and Kerswell-with-Combe, so a decision in College sits inside a wider pattern of decisions we track across the same authority — useful when an officer cites a precedent from the next area over.
Published figures for College and Teignbridge District Council. These are the numbers that decide what is realistic on your street, so we work from them rather than from national averages.
| Measure | College |
|---|---|
| Dwellings recorded | 2,630 |
| Built pre-1900 | 1,200 (46%) |
| Built 1900-1918 | 310 (12%) |
| Built 1919-1929 | 60 (2%) |
| Built 1930-1939 | 110 (4%) |
| Built 1945-1954 | 20 (1%) |
| Built 1955-1964 | 110 (4%) |
| Built 1965-1972 | 80 (3%) |
| Built 1973-1982 | 100 (4%) |
| Built 1983-1992 | 210 (8%) |
| Built 1993-1999 | 60 (2%) |
| Built 2000-2008 | 100 (4%) |
| Built before 1919 | 57% |
| Built 1919–1939 | 6% |
| Built 1945–2008 | 26% |
| Conservation areas in College | 3 (Forde Park, Newton Abbot, Wolborough Street…) |
| Conservation areas district-wide | 35 |
| Article 4 directions recorded | 0 |
| Householder applications decided | 325 |
| Householder applications granted | 82% |
| Decided within 8 weeks | 80% |
Dwelling stock from VOA council-tax data at 31 March 2025; conservation-area and Article 4 counts from planning.data.gov.uk (MHCLG); decision figures are Teignbridge District Council's own, from MHCLG live table PS2 for the year to 31 March 2026.
The side return is the classic terrace fix, and College has the stock for it — the borough is built largely from Victorian and earlier houses (46% of 2,630 homes), Edwardian houses (12%) and 1980s estate houses (8%), and the Victorian and Edwardian versions almost all have an L-shaped back addition with a wasted alley beside it. Fill that alley and the dark galley kitchen becomes a bright, square room the full width of the house. Teignbridge District Council judges the infill against Teignbridge District Council's development plan and the design policies it applies to householder applications, and because it runs along the party boundary, the neighbour relationship is read before the design.
That boundary is where the drawings earn their keep. We set the infill wall on or up to the line, keep the roof — usually a glazed lantern or a shallow pitch tying into the existing back-addition slope — below the neighbour's first-floor windows, and detail the rainwater and party-wall junction so the build is watertight and the Party Wall Act is satisfied. College contains Forde Park, Newton Abbot, Wolborough Street, Wolborough Hill conservation areas (Forde Park designated 1974), so materials, fenestration and roof form are assessed against the appraisal, so we resolve it on the section rather than leave it to the case officer.
Many of College's terraces sit in conservation areas — Forde Park, Newton Abbot, Wolborough Street and Wolborough Hill among them — where a side extension is no longer permitted development. No Article 4 direction is recorded for Teignbridge District Council, but College's 3 conservation areas still limit permitted development on those streets. We confirm the designation before a line is drawn.
Some single-storey side returns in College are permitted development, but the width and boundary make an application more likely than for a straight rear extension. You will normally need to apply to Teignbridge District Council if any of these apply:
We draw the infill wall on the boundary, the glazed roof below the neighbour's windows and the party-wall junction on the page — the details Teignbridge District Council's officers and your neighbour both check — and submit a validation-complete pack, whether that is a lawful development certificate or a full householder application.
Below is Teignbridge District Council's real householder decision record, drawn from official planning statistics and refreshed as new data lands. Teignbridge District Council granted 82% of its householder applications in the year to 31 March 2026, and Forde Park shapes what is approved here. Side returns hinge on width, roof glazing and the party boundary, so a pack that resolves those details upfront is decided faster and refused less often than a DIY submission.
Source: MHCLG planning application statistics (householder decisions, England, 1 April 2025 - 31 March 2026). Compare every borough on our London approval-rate league table.
Tell us about your project and get a fixed, no-obligation quote back within one working day. If you don't need planning permission at all, we'll tell you that too — for free.
Across Forde Park, Newton Abbot, Wolborough Street and Wolborough Hill, the approved side return is a single-storey infill roofed with a glazed lantern or roof light to pull daylight deep into the plan, its flank wall built on the boundary and finished to match the host brick. On the borough's victorian and earlier houses (46% of 2,630 homes), this is frequently the single biggest gain in usable ground-floor space, and where it stays within the width and height limits it can proceed under permitted development or a lawful development certificate.
The 2,630 homes here are 46% pre-1900, 12% 1900-1918, 8% 1983-1992, which is what sets the realistic roof and rear-projection options. We keep the glazed roof below the neighbour's cill line, set the gutter and the party-wall flashing so water and maintenance are designed in, and — where owners want the full open-plan room — pair the infill with a rear extension as a single wraparound application. That way Teignbridge District Council sees one coherent scheme rather than two overlapping ones.
We draw side-return infills on every terraced street in the borough. A few of the neighbourhoods where College side returns come up most often:
Side return extension drawings for Forde Park's conservation area designated in 1974 — width-checked, party-wall detailed and drawn to Teignbridge District Council's guidance.
Side return extension drawings for Newton Abbot, Wolborough Street's conservation area designated in 2010 — width-checked, party-wall detailed and drawn to Teignbridge District Council's guidance.
Side return extension drawings for Wolborough Hill's designated conservation area — width-checked, party-wall detailed and drawn to Teignbridge District Council's guidance.
Side return extension drawings for Newton Abbot's civil parish within College — width-checked, party-wall detailed and drawn to Teignbridge District Council's guidance.
Side return extension drawings for Ogwell's civil parish within College — width-checked, party-wall detailed and drawn to Teignbridge District Council's guidance.
Whether a side return in College needs permission comes down to width, storeys and whether the street is designated. This is how the cases compare.
| Side return type | Permitted development? | What it gains | What Teignbridge District Council checks |
|---|---|---|---|
| Single-storey infill, within limits | Often yes, if under half the house width | Full-width kitchen-diner | Width, 4m height, roof glazing |
| Single-storey, over half width | No — full application | Wider room, more light | Boundary treatment, neighbour amenity |
| Two-storey side return | No — full application | Room above as well as below | Bulk, overlooking, terrace rhythm |
| Wraparound (side + rear) | No — full application | L-shaped open-plan ground floor | Combined footprint, garden retained |
In conservation areas such as Forde Park and Newton Abbot, Wolborough Street, side extensions are not permitted development and always need a full application.
A fixed process built around how Teignbridge District Council validates and decides side-return applications — most drawings are submission-ready within seven days of survey.
Send us your College postcode and terrace type. We confirm your conservation and Article 4 status, whether the infill stays within the side-extension width limit, and score your odds against live Teignbridge District Council decisions.
We measure the side alley, the back-addition wall, floor and eaves levels and the neighbour's window heights — the numbers the width limit, roof pitch and party-wall detailing depend on.
Chartered designers develop the infill and its glazed roof to your brief, drawn inside the permitted-development limits or to Teignbridge District Council's extension guidance, with the boundary and party-wall junction detailed.
We submit the certificate or application, manage validation and case-officer queries, and revise the drawings free until Teignbridge District Council issues its decision.
Sometimes not. A single-storey side-return infill can be permitted development if it is no wider than half the original house, no higher than 4 metres, and the property is not on designated land. In College you will need a full application to Teignbridge District Council for anything wider or taller, for a two-storey side return, and for any side extension in a conservation area such as Forde Park and Newton Abbot, Wolborough Street, where those rights are removed.
It is an infill that fills the narrow open alley running alongside the rear back-addition of a Victorian or Edwardian terrace — the strip of ground that is usually too small to use. Building over it squares off the ground floor, so a cramped galley kitchen becomes a full-width room. College's period terraces are ideally suited to it, which is why the side return is one of the borough's most common extensions. Teignbridge District Council is the decision-maker.
Almost always. A side return is built on or up to the boundary with your neighbour, so the Party Wall etc. Act applies and you must serve notice before work starts — this is entirely separate from Teignbridge District Council's planning decision. We detail the party-wall junction on the drawings and flag the notice early so a surveyor can be appointed without delaying the build. This applies to your College address specifically.
Yes, and it is common — the combined L-shape is a wraparound extension. Once the side infill joins a rear projection beyond the permitted-development depth, the whole thing needs a full householder application to Teignbridge District Council rather than qualifying as permitted development. We draw it as one coherent scheme so the council assesses a single footprint, which reads more clearly than two overlapping proposals. This applies to your College address specifically.
A householder planning application in College runs to a statutory eight-week target, and a lawful development certificate to eight weeks as well, though an incomplete pack can stall at validation. Because a side return involves the boundary and roof glazing, a complete, well-detailed submission matters — we prepare it validation-complete and manage officer queries to keep the decision on track. Teignbridge District Council is the decision-maker.
We price each College side return individually, because alley width and roof form vary house to house, and send a fixed, no-obligation quote within one working day. It covers the full drawing pack with free revisions until Teignbridge District Council approves, and we confirm at the outset whether your infill is permitted development or needs an application. Call 020 7864 7245 to start.
Answer five quick questions and get a free planning score for your exact address — instantly. Then, if you want the full picture, unlock the detailed analysis: your council's live approval rates, local precedents, constraints on your street and a step-by-step route to permission.
Same fixed quotes, same fast drawings — wherever your project is.