
The full drawing set for a Teign Valley application — location and block plans, existing and proposed floor plans, elevations and sections, drawn to Teignbridge District Council's validation checklist so the pack is accepted first time, delivered in days and revised free until your decision, with a free approval-odds check first.
Teignbridge District Council granted 82% of the householder planning decisions it made in its latest published year — 5 points below the 87% England-wide householder average. Teign Valley contains Doddiscombsleigh, Higher Ashton, Lower Ashton conservation areas (Doddiscombsleigh designated 1996), so materials, fenestration and roof form are assessed against the appraisal, which is where a policy-literate drawing pack earns its keep. Its dominant Victorian (1837–1901) housing stock sets the design brief on most streets.
The permitted-development ceilings are fixed: 40m³ of new roof volume for a terraced loft and 50m³ for a semi or detached house under Class B, plus a 3m single-storey rear extension on a terrace or 4m on a detached house under Class A. In conservation areas such as Doddiscombsleigh, Higher Ashton and Lower Ashton those rights are removed, so we confirm your exact address before a line is drawn. A validated householder application in Teign Valley is determined against an 8-week statutory target.
Doddiscombsleigh (conservation area designated in 1996), Higher Ashton (conservation area designated in 1996), Lower Ashton (conservation area designated in 1990), Trusham (conservation area designated in 1996), Tedburn St. Mary (civil parish within Teign Valley), Trusham (civil parish within Teign Valley), Ashton (civil parish within Teign Valley), Bridford (civil parish within Teign Valley), Christow (civil parish within Teign Valley) and Doddiscombsleigh (civil parish within Teign Valley) — these are the Teign Valley pockets our drawings cover most. Heritage designations here include Doddiscombsleigh, Higher Ashton, Lower Ashton and Trusham. Teignbridge District Council weighs each proposal against Teignbridge District Council's development plan and the design policies it applies to householder applications, where the 2,100 homes here are 30% pre-1900, 13% 1983-1992, 11% 1973-1982, which is what sets the realistic roof and rear-projection options. On roofs the borough is steeply pitched slate roofs, valley gutters and party parapets typical of pre-1900 building and trussed-rafter roofs typical of 1980s building, over Victorian and earlier houses (30% of 2,100 homes), 1980s estate houses (13%) and 1970s and early-1980s houses (11%).
Before anything is drawn we check your address against the designations that apply in Teign Valley: Doddiscombsleigh (conservation area designated in 1996), Higher Ashton (conservation area designated in 1996), Lower Ashton (conservation area designated in 1990) and Trusham (conservation area designated in 1996). Inside those boundaries permitted development is curtailed and Teignbridge District Council assesses materials, window detail and roof form against the area's own appraisal, so a scheme that would be waved through two streets away can need a full application here.
Beyond the designated areas, Teign Valley takes in Tedburn St. Mary, Trusham, Ashton, Bridford, Christow and Doddiscombsleigh. No Article 4 direction is recorded for Teignbridge District Council, but Teign Valley's 4 conservation areas still limit permitted development on those streets.
On stock, Teign Valley is Victorian and earlier houses (30% of 2,100 homes), 1980s estate houses (13%) and 1970s and early-1980s houses (11%) — which is why steeply pitched slate roofs, valley gutters and party parapets typical of pre-1900 building and trussed-rafter roofs typical of 1980s building govern what a loft or rear projection can realistically be. Teignbridge District Council decided 325 householder applications in the latest published year and granted 82%, with 80% issued inside the eight-week target. That decision record, not a national figure, is what we design to.
The full build-period split for Teign Valley runs pre-1900 30% (620 homes), 1900-1918 0% (10 homes), 1919-1929 2% (50 homes), 1930-1939 3% (70 homes), 1945-1954 4% (80 homes), 1955-1964 8% (160 homes), 1965-1972 10% (210 homes), 1973-1982 11% (230 homes), 1983-1992 13% (270 homes), 1993-1999 5% (100 homes) and 2000-2008 5% (110 homes). That distribution is why pre-1900 detailing dominates the drawings here, and it is measured from council-tax records rather than assumed from the street name.
Teignbridge District Council also decides for Ambrook, Bovey, Buckland & Milber, Chudleigh, College, Dawlish South West, Kenn Valley and Kenton & Starcross, so a decision in Teign Valley sits inside a wider pattern of decisions we track across the same authority — useful when an officer cites a precedent from the next area over.
Published figures for Teign Valley and Teignbridge District Council. These are the numbers that decide what is realistic on your street, so we work from them rather than from national averages.
| Measure | Teign Valley |
|---|---|
| Dwellings recorded | 2,100 |
| Built pre-1900 | 620 (30%) |
| Built 1900-1918 | 10 (0%) |
| Built 1919-1929 | 50 (2%) |
| Built 1930-1939 | 70 (3%) |
| Built 1945-1954 | 80 (4%) |
| Built 1955-1964 | 160 (8%) |
| Built 1965-1972 | 210 (10%) |
| Built 1973-1982 | 230 (11%) |
| Built 1983-1992 | 270 (13%) |
| Built 1993-1999 | 100 (5%) |
| Built 2000-2008 | 110 (5%) |
| Built before 1919 | 30% |
| Built 1919–1939 | 6% |
| Built 1945–2008 | 55% |
| Conservation areas in Teign Valley | 4 (Doddiscombsleigh, Higher Ashton…) |
| Conservation areas district-wide | 35 |
| Article 4 directions recorded | 0 |
| Householder applications decided | 325 |
| Householder applications granted | 82% |
| Decided within 8 weeks | 80% |
Dwelling stock from VOA council-tax data at 31 March 2025; conservation-area and Article 4 counts from planning.data.gov.uk (MHCLG); decision figures are Teignbridge District Council's own, from MHCLG live table PS2 for the year to 31 March 2026.
Whatever you are building, Teignbridge District Council decides it from the same core set. A location plan at 1:1250 fixes the site on the map with the red-line boundary; a block plan at 1:500 shows the property in its plot; then existing and proposed floor plans and elevations at 1:100 or 1:50 show the house as it is and as it will be. Larger schemes add a section and, where policy requires, a design and access statement. Miss one and the application is returned invalid before an officer has looked at it.
The drawings are also the argument. Teignbridge District Council assesses each proposal against Teignbridge District Council's development plan and the design policies it applies to householder applications, and the elevations are where the case is won or lost — ridge and eaves heights, window positions, materials and how the change reads from the street. On Teign Valley's stock, which runs to Victorian and earlier houses (30% of 2,100 homes), 1980s estate houses (13%) and 1970s and early-1980s houses (11%), the same scheme is drawn differently to answer the concerns officers raise here. Teign Valley contains Doddiscombsleigh, Higher Ashton, Lower Ashton conservation areas (Doddiscombsleigh designated 1996), so materials, fenestration and roof form are assessed against the appraisal, so the pack is built to pre-empt exactly that.
Where the property sits in a conservation area — Doddiscombsleigh, Higher Ashton, Lower Ashton and Trusham among Teign Valley's — validation is stricter still, often demanding heritage detail and sometimes additional plans. No Article 4 direction is recorded for Teignbridge District Council, but Teign Valley's 4 conservation areas still limit permitted development on those streets. We confirm the designation before drawing so the pack meets the higher bar first time.

Teignbridge District Council validates against a published checklist before it assesses anything. A typical householder application needs each of these, correctly scaled and labelled:
We draw the complete set — location and block plans, existing and proposed plans, elevations and any section — to Teignbridge District Council's checklist, then lodge it on the Planning Portal, manage validation and answer case-officer queries so the application is decided on its merits, not bounced on a technicality.
Below is Teignbridge District Council's real householder decision record, drawn from official planning statistics and refreshed as new data lands. Teignbridge District Council granted 82% of its householder applications in the year to 31 March 2026, and Doddiscombsleigh shapes what is approved here. A complete, correctly scaled pack that answers those concerns on the elevations is validated faster and refused less often than one that leaves them for the officer to raise.
Source: MHCLG planning application statistics (householder decisions, England, 1 April 2025 - 31 March 2026). Compare every borough on our London approval-rate league table.
Tell us about your project and get a fixed, no-obligation quote back within one working day. If you don't need planning permission at all, we'll tell you that too — for free.
Two different things sink an application, and they happen at two different stages. First is validation: a missing block plan, an unscaled elevation, no red line, no north point — Teignbridge District Council returns the whole submission and the clock never starts. Getting the pack right at this stage is purely mechanical, and it is where a lot of self-submitted Teign Valley applications lose weeks. We draw to the checklist so this never happens.
Second is the planning judgement itself, once the pack is valid. The 2,100 homes here are 30% pre-1900, 13% 1983-1992, 11% 1973-1982, which is what sets the realistic roof and rear-projection options. Across Doddiscombsleigh, Higher Ashton and Lower Ashton the recurring refusals are about scale, overlooking and how the proposal sits against its neighbours — all of which are settled on the drawings. We draw the scheme to answer them before submission rather than after a refusal.

The application pack is the same discipline whatever the project. A few of the Teign Valley neighbourhoods and property types we prepare drawings for most often:
Planning drawings for Doddiscombsleigh's conservation area designated in 1996 — scaled, validation-ready and drawn to Teignbridge District Council's guidance.
Planning drawings for Higher Ashton's conservation area designated in 1996 — scaled, validation-ready and drawn to Teignbridge District Council's guidance.
Planning drawings for Lower Ashton's conservation area designated in 1990 — scaled, validation-ready and drawn to Teignbridge District Council's guidance.
Planning drawings for Trusham's conservation area designated in 1996 — scaled, validation-ready and drawn to Teignbridge District Council's guidance.
Planning drawings for Tedburn St. Mary's civil parish within Teign Valley — scaled, validation-ready and drawn to Teignbridge District Council's guidance.
Planning drawings for Trusham's civil parish within Teign Valley — scaled, validation-ready and drawn to Teignbridge District Council's guidance.
The route decides what Teignbridge District Council needs and how long it takes. This is how the common Teign Valley routes compare.
| Route | When it applies | Core drawings | Typical decision |
|---|---|---|---|
| Householder application | Extensions and alterations to a single house | Location, block, existing & proposed plans and elevations | About 8 weeks |
| Full application | Flats, new units, changes of use | As householder plus site plan and often a section | 8–13 weeks |
| Lawful development certificate | Confirming a scheme is permitted development | Existing & proposed plans and elevations to prove PD limits | About 8 weeks |
| Prior approval | Larger single-storey rear extensions | Plans and elevations plus neighbour notification | About 6 weeks |
In a conservation area such as Doddiscombsleigh and Higher Ashton, householder permitted-development rights are often restricted, so a full application and heritage detail may be required.
A fixed process built around how Teignbridge District Council validates and decides — most drawing sets are submission-ready within seven days of survey.
Send us your Teign Valley postcode and what you want to build. We confirm your conservation and Article 4 status, tell you which application route applies, and score your odds against live Teignbridge District Council decisions.
We measure the property and plot so the existing plans and elevations are accurate to the millimetre — the base every proposed drawing and every officer judgement is built on.
Chartered designers produce the full validation pack — location and block plans, existing and proposed plans, elevations, any section and a design and access statement — drawn to Teignbridge District Council's checklist.
We lodge the application on the Planning Portal, manage validation and case-officer queries, and revise the drawings free until Teignbridge District Council issues its decision.
Teignbridge District Council validates a householder application against a set list: a location plan at 1:1250 with a red-line boundary, a block plan at 1:500, and existing and proposed floor plans and elevations at 1:100 or 1:50, each with a scale bar and north point. Larger schemes and most conservation-area work also need a design and access statement. If any of these is missing or unscaled the application is returned invalid before it is assessed. This applies to your Teign Valley address specifically.
Almost always because the drawing pack is incomplete or wrongly scaled — a missing block plan, an elevation with no scale, no red line on the location plan, no north point. Teignbridge District Council checks the pack against its validation list before an officer ever assesses the scheme, so these purely technical gaps cost weeks. Drawing to the checklist from the outset is the simplest way to avoid a return. This applies to your Teign Valley address specifically.
Yes. We prepare the full drawing set, lodge it on the Planning Portal on your behalf, pay the Teignbridge District Council fee where you prefer us to, and then manage validation and case-officer questions through to the decision. You get the reference number and updates without dealing with the portal or the council yourself. This applies to your Teign Valley address specifically.
A householder application is a statutory eight weeks from validation, and a full application eight to thirteen weeks depending on scale. The date that matters is validation, not submission — an invalid pack never starts the clock. Because we draw to Teignbridge District Council's checklist the application validates quickly, so the statutory period begins without the delay a returned pack causes. This applies to your Teign Valley address specifically.
You do not strictly need a planning application, but scaled existing and proposed drawings are still worth having: a lawful development certificate from Teignbridge District Council proves the scheme is permitted development, which lenders and buyers increasingly ask for, and your builder needs the drawings to price and build. In a conservation area such as Doddiscombsleigh and Higher Ashton, permitted-development rights are often removed, so a full application may be needed after all — we confirm which before you commit. This applies to your Teign Valley address specifically.
We price each Teign Valley job individually — the scope of the survey and the size of the drawing set vary from a simple rear extension to a whole-house scheme — and send a fixed, no-obligation quote within one working day. It covers the full validation pack with free revisions until Teignbridge District Council decides. The Teignbridge District Council application fee is separate and paid to the council. Call 020 7864 7245 to start.
Answer five quick questions and get a free planning score for your exact address — instantly. Then, if you want the full picture, unlock the detailed analysis: your council's live approval rates, local precedents, constraints on your street and a step-by-step route to permission.
Same fixed quotes, same fast drawings — wherever your project is.