The fast route to a deep single-storey rear extension in Rainham North — up to 6 metres on an attached house or 8 on a detached one — via Medway Council's prior approval scheme rather than a full planning application.
Medway Council granted 96% of the householder planning decisions it made in its latest published year — 9 points above the 87% England-wide householder average. Rainham North contains Lower Rainham, Lower Twydall conservation areas (Lower Rainham designated 1989), so materials, fenestration and roof form are assessed against the appraisal, which is where a policy-literate drawing pack earns its keep. Its dominant postwar (1945–1970) housing stock sets the design brief on most streets.
Under Class B, a rear dormer stays permitted development up to 40m³ of added roof volume on a terrace or 50m³ on a semi-detached or detached house, while Class A allows a single-storey rear extension of 3m beyond the original rear wall on a terrace and 4m on a detached house before a full application is needed. Rainham North carries at least one Article 4 direction, and conservation areas including Lower Rainham and Lower Twydall remove those rights outright, so we confirm your exact address before a line is drawn. A validated householder application in Rainham North is determined against an 8-week statutory target.
Lower Rainham (conservation area designated in 1989) and Lower Twydall (conservation area designated in 1984) — these are the Rainham North pockets our drawings cover most. Heritage designations here include Lower Rainham and Lower Twydall. Medway Council weighs each proposal against the adopted Medway local plan and Medway Council's design guidance for householder work, where the 6,620 homes here are 19% 1955-1964, 19% 1965-1972, 12% 1973-1982, which is what sets the realistic roof and rear-projection options. On roofs the borough is shallow gabled roofs typical of that period's building and shallow-pitched roofs and integral garages typical of that period's building, over late-1950s and early-1960s houses (19% of 6,620 homes), late-1960s and early-1970s houses (19%) and 1970s and early-1980s houses (12%).
Rainham North's designated heritage is specific, and it is the first thing we check against your address: Lower Rainham (conservation area designated in 1989) and Lower Twydall (conservation area designated in 1984). Inside those boundaries permitted development is curtailed and Medway Council assesses materials, window detail and roof form against the area's own appraisal, so a scheme that would be waved through two streets away can need a full application here.
Medway Council has 47 recorded Article 4 directions — check the address before assuming PD applies in Rainham North.
On stock, Rainham North is late-1950s and early-1960s houses (19% of 6,620 homes), late-1960s and early-1970s houses (19%) and 1970s and early-1980s houses (12%) — which is why shallow gabled roofs typical of that period's building and shallow-pitched roofs and integral garages typical of that period's building govern what a loft or rear projection can realistically be. Medway Council decided 540 householder applications in the latest published year and granted 96%, with 94% issued inside the eight-week target. Those are the numbers our drawings are prepared against.
The full build-period split for Rainham North runs pre-1900 9% (610 homes), 1900-1918 1% (90 homes), 1919-1929 1% (90 homes), 1930-1939 9% (590 homes), 1945-1954 7% (440 homes), 1955-1964 19% (1,270 homes), 1965-1972 19% (1,260 homes), 1973-1982 12% (770 homes), 1983-1992 1% (80 homes), 1993-1999 6% (420 homes) and 2000-2008 2% (140 homes). That distribution is why pre-1900 detailing dominates the drawings here, and it is measured from council-tax records rather than assumed from the street name.
Medway Council also decides for All Saints, Fort Pitt, Rainham South East and Strood Rural, so a decision in Rainham North sits inside a wider pattern of decisions we track across the same authority — useful when an officer cites a precedent from the next area over.
The Article 4 directions recorded for this council include Brompton Lines(1), Brompton Lines(2), Chatham Central & Brompton and Fort Pitt. Each removes a specific permitted-development right inside its own boundary, which is why the check is done on the address rather than on the town.
Published figures for Rainham North and Medway Council. These are the numbers that decide what is realistic on your street, so we work from them rather than from national averages.
| Measure | Rainham North |
|---|---|
| Dwellings recorded | 6,620 |
| Built pre-1900 | 610 (9%) |
| Built 1900-1918 | 90 (1%) |
| Built 1919-1929 | 90 (1%) |
| Built 1930-1939 | 590 (9%) |
| Built 1945-1954 | 440 (7%) |
| Built 1955-1964 | 1,270 (19%) |
| Built 1965-1972 | 1,260 (19%) |
| Built 1973-1982 | 770 (12%) |
| Built 1983-1992 | 80 (1%) |
| Built 1993-1999 | 420 (6%) |
| Built 2000-2008 | 140 (2%) |
| Built before 1919 | 11% |
| Built 1919–1939 | 10% |
| Built 1945–2008 | 66% |
| Conservation areas in Rainham North | 2 (Lower Rainham, Lower Twydall) |
| Conservation areas district-wide | 24 |
| Article 4 directions recorded | 47 |
| Householder applications decided | 540 |
| Householder applications granted | 96% |
| Decided within 8 weeks | 94% |
Dwelling stock from VOA council-tax data at 31 March 2025; conservation-area and Article 4 counts from planning.data.gov.uk (MHCLG); decision figures are Medway Council's own, from MHCLG live table PS2 for the year to 31 March 2026.
The ordinary Class A limits stop a single-storey rear extension at 3 metres on an attached house and 4 on a detached one. The larger home extension scheme doubles both, on condition that the council is told first. That notification is not an application for permission — the council cannot refuse on design, materials or policy grounds. It can only consider the effect on the amenity of adjoining premises, and only if a neighbour actually objects during the 21-day consultation.
The other conditions still apply and are strict: single storey only, no higher than 4 metres, eaves no higher than the existing eaves, and no more than half the land around the original house covered. It is not available on designated land, so a house in a conservation area such as Lower Rainham and Lower Twydall cannot use it at all. Materials must be similar to the existing house, and the extension must not include a veranda, balcony or raised platform.
Rainham North is largely late-1950s and early-1960s houses (19% of 6,620 homes), late-1960s and early-1970s houses (19%) and 1970s and early-1980s houses (12%). Rainham North contains Lower Rainham, Lower Twydall conservation areas (Lower Rainham designated 1989), so materials, fenestration and roof form are assessed against the appraisal, which matters here because an objecting neighbour puts amenity squarely in front of a case officer. Medway Council has 47 recorded Article 4 directions — check the address before assuming PD applies in Rainham North.
The scheme is available where all of these hold. Fail any one and it is a full application to Medway Council instead:
We prepare the notification pack Medway Council needs — plans, elevations, a site plan with the adjoining owners identified — and manage the 21-day neighbour consultation so the 42-day clock is not restarted by an incomplete submission.
Below is Medway Council's real householder decision record, drawn from official planning statistics and refreshed as new data lands. Medway Council granted 96% of its householder applications in the year to 31 March 2026, and Lower Rainham shapes what is approved here. Prior approval turns on neighbour amenity alone, so the drawings that matter are the ones showing the relationship to the boundary.
Source: MHCLG planning application statistics (householder decisions, England, 1 April 2025 - 31 March 2026). Compare every borough on our London approval-rate league table.
Tell us about your project and get a fixed, no-obligation quote back within one working day. If you don't need planning permission at all, we'll tell you that too — for free.
Across Lower Rainham and Lower Twydall, the notifications that clear without objection are the ones that treat the neighbour as the audience. We show the extension in section against the boundary, demonstrate the 45-degree daylight relationship to the nearest habitable window, and where the plot is tight we taper the depth away from the boundary rather than running the full 6 metres to the fence.
The 6,620 homes here are 19% 1955-1964, 19% 1965-1972, 12% 1973-1982, which is what sets the realistic roof and rear-projection options. Where an objection does arrive, the council's assessment is narrow: loss of light, outlook and overbearing effect on the adjoining property, nothing else. A pack that has already answered those three points on the drawings usually survives an objection, whereas one that leaves them to the officer's imagination usually does not.
We prepare prior-approval notifications across Rainham North. A few of the areas where deep rear extensions come up most often:
Prior approval drawings for Lower Rainham — conservation area designated in 1989 — dimensioned to the 6m and 8m limits and prepared for Medway Council's neighbour consultation.
Prior approval drawings for Lower Twydall — conservation area designated in 1984 — dimensioned to the 6m and 8m limits and prepared for Medway Council's neighbour consultation.
Same extension, two routes, very different tests.
| Route | Depth allowed | What the council may consider | Timescale |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ordinary Class A permitted development | 3m attached / 4m detached | Nothing — no application needed | Immediate |
| Larger home extension prior approval | 6m attached / 8m detached | Amenity of adjoining premises, only if a neighbour objects | 21-day consultation, 42-day determination |
| Full householder application | No fixed limit | Design, materials, policy, amenity, everything | 8-week target |
| Any of these on designated land | 3m / 4m only | Prior approval scheme unavailable | Full application beyond the limits |
Limits and procedure from the GPDO 2015, Schedule 2, Part 1, Class A and paragraph A.4, made permanent by amendment in 2019.
A process built around the 21-day consultation, which is where these schemes are won or lost.
Send us your Rainham North postcode and house type. We confirm whether the property is on designated land, whether the scheme is available, and what depth you can realistically take.
We measure the original rear wall, eaves height, boundary distances and the neighbouring windows that the amenity assessment will turn on.
We draw the extension to the 6m or 8m limit with the boundary relationship shown in section, and prepare the written description and adjoining-owner details Medway Council needs to start the consultation.
We submit, track the 21-day consultation and the 42-day determination, respond to any objection on amenity grounds, and revise free until the decision.
Three metres on a terraced or semi-detached house and four on a detached one under ordinary permitted development. Under the larger home extension prior approval scheme those double to six and eight metres, provided you notify Medway Council before starting and the conditions on height, materials and land coverage are met. The scheme is not available on designated land. This applies to your Rainham North address specifically.
It is a notification, not an application for permission. You tell Medway Council what you intend to build, it writes to the adjoining owners, and they have 21 days to object. If nobody objects, you may build. If someone does, the council assesses the effect on the amenity of adjoining premises and must decide within 42 days. Design and policy are not in scope. This applies to your Rainham North address specifically.
The council then considers the impact on the amenity of the adjoining property — loss of light, loss of outlook, and overbearing effect — and nothing else. It cannot refuse because it dislikes the design or the materials. We prepare the drawings so those three questions are already answered in section and on the site plan, which is what usually carries an objected scheme through. This applies to your Rainham North address specifically. Medway Council is the decision-maker.
No. The larger home extension scheme is unavailable on designated land, which includes conservation areas such as Lower Rainham and Lower Twydall, national landscapes, national parks and world heritage sites. On those properties the ordinary 3-metre and 4-metre limits apply, and anything deeper needs a full householder application to Medway Council. This applies to your Rainham North address specifically.
Twenty-one days for the neighbour consultation, and a maximum of 42 days from a valid submission for the council to determine it. If the council does not respond within 42 days you may proceed as notified. That deadline is the scheme's real advantage over a full application, and it is why validation completeness matters so much. This applies to your Rainham North address specifically. Medway Council is the decision-maker.
Yes — always. Prior approval deals only with the planning position. A 6-metre rear extension still needs building control approval for foundations, structure, drainage, thermal performance and fire safety, and the beam over the opening into the existing house needs designing and calculating. We prepare both sets so the notified scheme is the buildable one. This applies to your Rainham North address specifically. Medway Council is the decision-maker.
We quote each Rainham North scheme individually, because plot shape and the boundary relationship drive the work, and send a fixed, no-obligation quote within one working day. It covers the notification pack and free revisions until Medway Council determines it. Call 020 7864 7245 to start.
Answer five quick questions and get a free planning score for your exact address — instantly. Then, if you want the full picture, unlock the detailed analysis: your council's live approval rates, local precedents, constraints on your street and a step-by-step route to permission.
Same fixed quotes, same fast drawings — wherever your project is.