The fast route to a deep single-storey rear extension in Mousehold — up to 6 metres on an attached house or 8 on a detached one — via Norwich City Council's prior approval scheme rather than a full planning application.
Norwich City Council granted 93% of the householder planning decisions it made in its latest published year — 6 points above the 87% England-wide householder average. The Mile Cross conservation area protects a nationally notable early garden-suburb layout, so the symmetry and building line of the estate constrain alterations, which is where a policy-literate drawing pack earns its keep. Its dominant Victorian (1837–1901), Edwardian (1901–1910) and interwar (1918–1939) housing stock sets the design brief on most streets.
Under Class B, a rear dormer stays permitted development up to 40m³ of added roof volume on a terrace or 50m³ on a semi-detached or detached house, while Class A allows a single-storey rear extension of 3m beyond the original rear wall on a terrace and 4m on a detached house before a full application is needed. In conservation areas such as Sewell, Mile Cross and Thorpe Hamlet those rights are removed, so we confirm your exact address before a line is drawn. A validated householder application in Mousehold is determined against an 8-week statutory target.
Sewell Park (planned Edwardian terraces framing the park near Constitution Hill), Mile Cross (one of the country's early interwar municipal garden suburbs), Constitution Hill (Victorian and Edwardian terraces climbing toward the heath), Gurney Road (houses fronting the open expanse of Mousehold Heath), Wolfe Road (compact terraces on the eastern heath fringe) and Silver Road (dense Victorian terraces between the city and the heath) — these are the Mousehold pockets our drawings cover most. Heritage designations here include Sewell, Mile Cross and Thorpe Hamlet. Norwich City Council weighs each proposal against the Greater Norwich Local Plan and the Norwich Development Management Policies, where the planned Edwardian character of Sewell Park expects frontages, bays and boundary treatments to be retained. On roofs the borough is pitched and gabled slate roofs on the Edwardian terraces and hipped tiled roofs on the interwar garden-suburb houses, over Edwardian terraces around Sewell Park, interwar garden-suburb housing at Mile Cross and Victorian terraces on the heath fringe.
The ordinary Class A limits stop a single-storey rear extension at 3 metres on an attached house and 4 on a detached one. The larger home extension scheme doubles both, on condition that the council is told first. That notification is not an application for permission — the council cannot refuse on design, materials or policy grounds. It can only consider the effect on the amenity of adjoining premises, and only if a neighbour actually objects during the 21-day consultation.
The other conditions still apply and are strict: single storey only, no higher than 4 metres, eaves no higher than the existing eaves, and no more than half the land around the original house covered. It is not available on designated land, so a house in a conservation area such as Sewell and Mile Cross cannot use it at all. Materials must be similar to the existing house, and the extension must not include a veranda, balcony or raised platform.
Mousehold is largely Edwardian terraces around Sewell Park, interwar garden-suburb housing at Mile Cross and Victorian terraces on the heath fringe. The Mile Cross conservation area protects a nationally notable early garden-suburb layout, so the symmetry and building line of the estate constrain alterations, which matters here because an objecting neighbour puts amenity squarely in front of a case officer. The Mousehold Heath fringe lies outside the city-centre office-to-residential Article 4 area and has no HMO direction, so most houses keep permitted-development rights — but the Sewell Park and Mile Cross conservation areas remove the usual rights over their planned Edwardian and interwar frontages.
The scheme is available where all of these hold. Fail any one and it is a full application to Norwich City Council instead:
We prepare the notification pack Norwich City Council needs — plans, elevations, a site plan with the adjoining owners identified — and manage the 21-day neighbour consultation so the 42-day clock is not restarted by an incomplete submission.
Below is Norwich City Council's real householder decision record, drawn from official planning statistics and refreshed as new data lands. Norwich approves roughly 93% of applications, but on the Mousehold fringe the protected garden-suburb layout at Mile Cross and the planned Sewell Park streets are what govern the design of extensions. Prior approval turns on neighbour amenity alone, so the drawings that matter are the ones showing the relationship to the boundary.
Source: MHCLG planning application statistics (householder decisions, England, 1 April 2025 - 31 March 2026). Compare every borough on our London approval-rate league table.
Tell us about your project and get a fixed, no-obligation quote back within one working day. If you don't need planning permission at all, we'll tell you that too — for free.
Across Sewell Park, Mile Cross and Constitution Hill, the notifications that clear without objection are the ones that treat the neighbour as the audience. We show the extension in section against the boundary, demonstrate the 45-degree daylight relationship to the nearest habitable window, and where the plot is tight we taper the depth away from the boundary rather than running the full 6 metres to the fence.
The planned Edwardian character of Sewell Park expects frontages, bays and boundary treatments to be retained. Where an objection does arrive, the council's assessment is narrow: loss of light, outlook and overbearing effect on the adjoining property, nothing else. A pack that has already answered those three points on the drawings usually survives an objection, whereas one that leaves them to the officer's imagination usually does not.
We prepare prior-approval notifications across Mousehold. A few of the areas where deep rear extensions come up most often:
Prior approval drawings for Sewell Park — planned Edwardian terraces framing the park near Constitution Hill — dimensioned to the 6m and 8m limits and prepared for Norwich City Council's neighbour consultation.
Prior approval drawings for Mile Cross — one of the country's early interwar municipal garden suburbs — dimensioned to the 6m and 8m limits and prepared for Norwich City Council's neighbour consultation.
Prior approval drawings for Constitution Hill — Victorian and Edwardian terraces climbing toward the heath — dimensioned to the 6m and 8m limits and prepared for Norwich City Council's neighbour consultation.
Prior approval drawings for Gurney Road — houses fronting the open expanse of Mousehold Heath — dimensioned to the 6m and 8m limits and prepared for Norwich City Council's neighbour consultation.
Prior approval drawings for Wolfe Road — compact terraces on the eastern heath fringe — dimensioned to the 6m and 8m limits and prepared for Norwich City Council's neighbour consultation.
Prior approval drawings for Silver Road — dense Victorian terraces between the city and the heath — dimensioned to the 6m and 8m limits and prepared for Norwich City Council's neighbour consultation.
Same extension, two routes, very different tests.
| Route | Depth allowed | What the council may consider | Timescale |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ordinary Class A permitted development | 3m attached / 4m detached | Nothing — no application needed | Immediate |
| Larger home extension prior approval | 6m attached / 8m detached | Amenity of adjoining premises, only if a neighbour objects | 21-day consultation, 42-day determination |
| Full householder application | No fixed limit | Design, materials, policy, amenity, everything | 8-week target |
| Any of these on designated land | 3m / 4m only | Prior approval scheme unavailable | Full application beyond the limits |
Limits and procedure from the GPDO 2015, Schedule 2, Part 1, Class A and paragraph A.4, made permanent by amendment in 2019.
A process built around the 21-day consultation, which is where these schemes are won or lost.
Send us your Mousehold postcode and house type. We confirm whether the property is on designated land, whether the scheme is available, and what depth you can realistically take.
We measure the original rear wall, eaves height, boundary distances and the neighbouring windows that the amenity assessment will turn on.
We draw the extension to the 6m or 8m limit with the boundary relationship shown in section, and prepare the written description and adjoining-owner details Norwich City Council needs to start the consultation.
We submit, track the 21-day consultation and the 42-day determination, respond to any objection on amenity grounds, and revise free until the decision.
Three metres on a terraced or semi-detached house and four on a detached one under ordinary permitted development. Under the larger home extension prior approval scheme those double to six and eight metres, provided you notify Norwich City Council before starting and the conditions on height, materials and land coverage are met. The scheme is not available on designated land. This applies to your Mousehold address specifically.
It is a notification, not an application for permission. You tell Norwich City Council what you intend to build, it writes to the adjoining owners, and they have 21 days to object. If nobody objects, you may build. If someone does, the council assesses the effect on the amenity of adjoining premises and must decide within 42 days. Design and policy are not in scope. This applies to your Mousehold address specifically.
The council then considers the impact on the amenity of the adjoining property — loss of light, loss of outlook, and overbearing effect — and nothing else. It cannot refuse because it dislikes the design or the materials. We prepare the drawings so those three questions are already answered in section and on the site plan, which is what usually carries an objected scheme through. This applies to your Mousehold address specifically. Norwich City Council is the decision-maker.
No. The larger home extension scheme is unavailable on designated land, which includes conservation areas such as Sewell and Mile Cross, national landscapes, national parks and world heritage sites. On those properties the ordinary 3-metre and 4-metre limits apply, and anything deeper needs a full householder application to Norwich City Council. This applies to your Mousehold address specifically.
Twenty-one days for the neighbour consultation, and a maximum of 42 days from a valid submission for the council to determine it. If the council does not respond within 42 days you may proceed as notified. That deadline is the scheme's real advantage over a full application, and it is why validation completeness matters so much. This applies to your Mousehold address specifically. Norwich City Council is the decision-maker.
Yes — always. Prior approval deals only with the planning position. A 6-metre rear extension still needs building control approval for foundations, structure, drainage, thermal performance and fire safety, and the beam over the opening into the existing house needs designing and calculating. We prepare both sets so the notified scheme is the buildable one. This applies to your Mousehold address specifically. Norwich City Council is the decision-maker.
We quote each Mousehold scheme individually, because plot shape and the boundary relationship drive the work, and send a fixed, no-obligation quote within one working day. It covers the notification pack and free revisions until Norwich City Council determines it. Call 020 7864 7245 to start.
Answer five quick questions and get a free planning score for your exact address — instantly. Then, if you want the full picture, unlock the detailed analysis: your council's live approval rates, local precedents, constraints on your street and a step-by-step route to permission.
Same fixed quotes, same fast drawings — wherever your project is.