Annexe and granny-flat drawings for Medway homes — designed to stay ancillary to the main house rather than become a separate dwelling, drawn to Medway Council's policies, delivered in days and revised free until your decision.
Medway Council granted 96% of the householder planning decisions it made in its latest published year — 9 points above the 87% England-wide householder average. Medway contains Cliffe, Frindsbury and Manor Farm, Lower Rainham conservation areas (Cliffe designated 1973), so materials, fenestration and roof form are assessed against the appraisal, which is where a policy-literate drawing pack earns its keep. Its dominant postwar (1945–1970) housing stock sets the design brief on most streets.
Before permission is required, Class B allows 40m³ of added loft volume on a terrace and 50m³ on a semi or detached house, and Class A allows a 3m single-storey rear extension on a terrace or 4m on a detached house. Medway carries at least one Article 4 direction, and conservation areas including Cliffe, Frindsbury and Manor Farm and Lower Rainham remove those rights outright, so we confirm your exact address before a line is drawn. A validated householder application in Medway is determined against an 8-week statutory target.
Cliffe (conservation area designated in 1973), Frindsbury and Manor Farm (conservation area designated in 1996), Lower Rainham (conservation area designated in 1989), Lower Twydall (conservation area designated in 1984), Maidstone Road, Chatham (conservation area designated in 2005), Meresborough (conservation area designated in 1989), Moor Street (conservation area designated in 1989), New Road, Chatham (conservation area designated in 1972), All Saints (ward of Medway), Fort Pitt (ward of Medway), Rainham North (ward of Medway), Rainham South East (ward of Medway) and Strood Rural (ward of Medway) — these are the Medway pockets our drawings cover most. Heritage designations here include Cliffe, Frindsbury and Manor Farm, Lower Rainham, Lower Twydall, Maidstone Road, Chatham, Meresborough, Moor Street and New Road, Chatham. Medway Council weighs each proposal against Medway Council's development plan and the design policies it applies to householder applications, where the 24,730 homes here are 18% 1965-1972, 15% 1973-1982, 10% 1955-1964, which is what sets the realistic roof and rear-projection options. On roofs the borough is shallow-pitched roofs and integral garages typical of that period's building and shallow trussed roofs typical of 1970s building, over late-1960s and early-1970s houses (18% of 24,730 homes), 1970s and early-1980s houses (15%) and late-1950s and early-1960s houses (10%).
What is permitted in Medway turns on designation first, so that is where we start: Cliffe (conservation area designated in 1973), Frindsbury and Manor Farm (conservation area designated in 1996), Lower Rainham (conservation area designated in 1989), Lower Twydall (conservation area designated in 1984), Maidstone Road, Chatham (conservation area designated in 2005), Meresborough (conservation area designated in 1989), Moor Street (conservation area designated in 1989) and New Road, Chatham (conservation area designated in 1972). Inside those boundaries permitted development is curtailed and Medway Council assesses materials, window detail and roof form against the area's own appraisal, so a scheme that would be waved through two streets away can need a full application here.
Beyond the designated areas, Medway takes in All Saints, Fort Pitt, Rainham North, Rainham South East and Strood Rural. Medway Council has 47 recorded Article 4 directions — check the address before assuming PD applies in the district.
On stock, Medway is late-1960s and early-1970s houses (18% of 24,730 homes), 1970s and early-1980s houses (15%) and late-1950s and early-1960s houses (10%) — which is why shallow-pitched roofs and integral garages typical of that period's building and shallow trussed roofs typical of 1970s building govern what a loft or rear projection can realistically be. Medway Council decided 540 householder applications in the latest published year and granted 96%, with 94% issued inside the eight-week target. We draw to that record rather than to a national average.
The full build-period split for Medway runs pre-1900 3% (190 homes), 1900-1918 0% (30 homes), 1919-1929 0% (10 homes), 1930-1939 6% (350 homes), 1945-1954 3% (170 homes), 1955-1964 30% (1,850 homes), 1965-1972 33% (1,990 homes), 1973-1982 4% (260 homes), 1983-1992 5% (310 homes), 1993-1999 4% (220 homes) and 2000-2008 3% (170 homes). That distribution is why pre-1900 detailing dominates the drawings here, and it is measured from council-tax records rather than assumed from the street name.
Medway Council also decides for All Saints, Fort Pitt, Rainham North, Rainham South East and Strood Rural, so a decision in Medway sits inside a wider pattern of decisions we track across the same authority — useful when an officer cites a precedent from the next area over.
The Article 4 directions recorded for this council include Brompton Lines(1), Brompton Lines(2), Chatham Central & Brompton and Fort Pitt. Each removes a specific permitted-development right inside its own boundary, which is why the check is done on the address rather than on the town.
Published figures for Medway and Medway Council. These are the numbers that decide what is realistic on your street, so we work from them rather than from national averages.
| Measure | Medway |
|---|---|
| Dwellings recorded | 24,730 |
| Built pre-1900 | 190 (3%) |
| Built 1900-1918 | 30 (0%) |
| Built 1919-1929 | 10 (0%) |
| Built 1930-1939 | 350 (6%) |
| Built 1945-1954 | 170 (3%) |
| Built 1955-1964 | 1,850 (30%) |
| Built 1965-1972 | 1,990 (33%) |
| Built 1973-1982 | 260 (4%) |
| Built 1983-1992 | 310 (5%) |
| Built 1993-1999 | 220 (4%) |
| Built 2000-2008 | 170 (3%) |
| Built before 1919 | 13% |
| Built 1919–1939 | 11% |
| Built 1945–2008 | 66% |
| Conservation areas in Medway | 8 (Cliffe, Frindsbury and Manor Farm…) |
| Conservation areas district-wide | 24 |
| Article 4 directions recorded | 47 |
| Householder applications decided | 540 |
| Householder applications granted | 96% |
| Decided within 8 weeks | 94% |
Dwelling stock from VOA council-tax data at 31 March 2025; conservation-area and Article 4 counts from planning.data.gov.uk (MHCLG); decision figures are Medway Council's own, from MHCLG live table PS2 for the year to 31 March 2026.
Councils do not decide annexes on square metres. They decide whether, once built, the accommodation forms part of one planning unit with the main house or a second one beside it. Medway Council looks at whether the garden is shared or divided, whether the annexe has its own street access and address, whether the occupier could live there entirely independently, and whether the two households would function as one. That is the whole case, and it is made or lost on the layout.
Medway is largely late-1960s and early-1970s houses (18% of 24,730 homes), 1970s and early-1980s houses (15%) and late-1950s and early-1960s houses (10%), which shapes the realistic options: converting part of the existing house, extending it, or building a detached unit in the garden. A detached annexe can sometimes sit under Class E as an outbuilding incidental to the enjoyment of the dwellinghouse — but sleeping accommodation is generally not "incidental", so a garden annexe with a bedroom usually needs its own permission rather than relying on outbuilding rights.
In Medway's conservation areas — including Cliffe and Frindsbury and Manor Farm — a garden building is also judged on its effect on the character of the area, which limits height and footprint before the use question is reached. Medway Council has 47 recorded Article 4 directions — check the address before assuming PD applies in the district.
An annexe almost always needs an application to Medway Council. Expect one where any of these apply:
We plan the annexe so its relationship to the main house is visible on the page — shared garden, connected access, a layout that reads as one household — and set out the case Medway Council has to test, rather than leaving the officer to assume the worst.
Below is Medway Council's real householder decision record, drawn from official planning statistics and refreshed as new data lands. Medway Council granted 96% of 540 householder decisions in the year to 31 March 2026, 94% of them inside eight weeks. Annexe applications are decided on use as much as design, so the supporting case matters as much as the elevations.
Source: MHCLG planning application statistics (householder decisions, England, 1 April 2025 - 31 March 2026). Compare every borough on our London approval-rate league table.
Tell us about your project and get a fixed, no-obligation quote back within one working day. If you don't need planning permission at all, we'll tell you that too — for free.
Across Cliffe, Frindsbury and Manor Farm and Lower Rainham, the annexes that succeed keep one shared garden, take access past the main house rather than from the street, and are modest against the host building — single storey where the plot is overlooked, and set back from boundaries. On late-1960s and early-1970s houses (18% of 24,730 homes), converting an integral garage or a rear ground floor is often approved more readily than a detached garden unit, because the ancillary relationship is self-evident.
Medway contains Cliffe, Frindsbury and Manor Farm, Lower Rainham conservation areas (Cliffe designated 1973), so materials, fenestration and roof form are assessed against the appraisal. Where Medway Council grants permission, it commonly attaches a condition tying occupation of the annexe to the main dwelling. That condition is not a problem to be avoided — it is usually the mechanism that makes approval possible, and we draft the application on that basis rather than pretending the annexe is something it is not.
We draw annexes across Medway. A few of the areas where multigenerational schemes come up most often:
Annexe and granny-flat drawings for Cliffe — conservation area designated in 1973 — planned to stay ancillary and drawn to Medway Council's policies.
Annexe and granny-flat drawings for Frindsbury and Manor Farm — conservation area designated in 1996 — planned to stay ancillary and drawn to Medway Council's policies.
Annexe and granny-flat drawings for Lower Rainham — conservation area designated in 1989 — planned to stay ancillary and drawn to Medway Council's policies.
Annexe and granny-flat drawings for Lower Twydall — conservation area designated in 1984 — planned to stay ancillary and drawn to Medway Council's policies.
Annexe and granny-flat drawings for Maidstone Road, Chatham — conservation area designated in 2005 — planned to stay ancillary and drawn to Medway Council's policies.
Annexe and granny-flat drawings for Meresborough — conservation area designated in 1989 — planned to stay ancillary and drawn to Medway Council's policies.
Three similar buildings, three different consents. This is what separates them.
| What you build | Planning status | Key test | What Medway Council checks |
|---|---|---|---|
| Garden room, no sleeping space | Often Class E permitted development | Incidental to the house | Height, footprint, boundary position |
| Annexe used by the household | Full application, usually with a tie condition | Ancillary use | Shared garden and access, layout |
| Self-contained unit, own access | New dwelling — full application | Separate planning unit | Policy on new homes, amenity, parking |
| Converted garage or ground floor | Often permitted, use still assessed | Whether use changes | Independence of the accommodation |
| Annexe on designated land | Full application | Designation | Character and appearance |
The ancillary/separate-dwelling distinction comes from section 55 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990; outbuilding limits from the GPDO 2015, Schedule 2, Part 1, Class E.
A fixed process built around how Medway Council tests the use question as well as the design.
Tell us who the annexe is for and where it would sit on the plot. We confirm designation status and tell you honestly whether the scheme reads as ancillary or as a separate dwelling in Medway.
We measure the plot, the existing house and the access route, so the shared-garden and shared-access case can be drawn rather than asserted.
Chartered designers develop the annexe to your brief, with the layout, access and garden relationship arranged to support the ancillary case under Medway Council's policies.
We submit the application with a supporting statement on use, manage validation and case-officer queries, and revise free until Medway Council decides.
Almost always. Sleeping accommodation is generally not "incidental" to the enjoyment of a house, so it falls outside the outbuilding permitted-development right, and any annexe that could function independently raises a change-of-use question under section 55. In Medway we prepare a full application to Medway Council and make the ancillary case explicitly rather than hoping it is not asked.
A shared garden rather than a divided one, access through the main property rather than a separate street entrance, occupation by a member of the same household, and a physical and functional relationship with the main house. Medway Council weighs those together — no single feature decides it, but a separate front door and a fenced-off garden together usually settle it against you.
Yes, subject to permission. A detached garden annexe is assessed on its scale against the plot, its effect on neighbours and the character of the area, and then on the use question. Keeping it single storey, set in from boundaries and served off the shared garden gives it the best prospect in Medway, particularly near designated areas such as Cliffe and Frindsbury and Manor Farm. Medway Council is the decision-maker.
Commonly, yes — a condition tying occupation of the annexe to the main dwelling, so it cannot be sold or let separately. That is normally what makes approval possible, because it removes the concern that a new independent home is being created without going through housing policy. The condition runs with the land, so it matters at resale, and we explain the implications before you commit. This applies to your Medway address specifically. Medway Council is the decision-maker.
Yes. A new annexe is new habitable accommodation, so structure, fire escape, insulation and ventilation all apply, and a detached annexe close to a boundary raises fire-spread requirements as well. Planning and building control are separate consents with separate submissions — we prepare both so the approved design is the one that can actually be built. This applies to your Medway address specifically. Medway Council is the decision-maker.
A householder application runs to an eight-week statutory target; where the council treats the annexe as creating a new unit it becomes a minor application with a thirteen-week target instead. Which route applies depends on how the use is characterised, which is precisely why the ancillary case is worth making properly at the outset. This applies to your Medway address specifically. Medway Council is the decision-maker.
We quote each Medway annexe individually, because plot, access and whether you are converting or building new all change the work, and send a fixed, no-obligation quote within one working day. It covers the full drawing pack and supporting statement, with free revisions until Medway Council approves. Call 020 7864 7245 to start.
Answer five quick questions and get a free planning score for your exact address — instantly. Then, if you want the full picture, unlock the detailed analysis: your council's live approval rates, local precedents, constraints on your street and a step-by-step route to permission.
Same fixed quotes, same fast drawings — wherever your project is.