Annexe and granny-flat drawings for Four Marks & Medstead homes — designed to stay ancillary to the main house rather than become a separate dwelling, drawn to East Hampshire District Council's policies, delivered in days and revised free until your decision.
East Hampshire District Council granted 91% of the householder planning decisions it made in its latest published year — 4 points above the 87% England-wide householder average. Four Marks & Medstead contains the Chawton conservation area (Chawton designated 1977), so materials, fenestration and roof form are assessed against the appraisal, which is where a policy-literate drawing pack earns its keep. Its dominant postwar (1945–1970) housing stock sets the design brief on most streets.
Before permission is required, Class B allows 40m³ of added loft volume on a terrace and 50m³ on a semi or detached house, and Class A allows a 3m single-storey rear extension on a terrace or 4m on a detached house. Four Marks & Medstead carries at least one Article 4 direction, and conservation areas including Chawton remove those rights outright, so we confirm your exact address before a line is drawn. A validated householder application in Four Marks & Medstead is determined against an 8-week statutory target.
Chawton (conservation area designated in 1977), Four Marks (civil parish within Four Marks & Medstead), Chawton (civil parish within Four Marks & Medstead) and Medstead (civil parish within Four Marks & Medstead) — these are the Four Marks & Medstead pockets our drawings cover most. Heritage designations here include Chawton. East Hampshire District Council weighs each proposal against East Hampshire District Council's adopted local plan and its householder design guidance, where the 3,150 homes here are 13% 1955-1964, 12% 2000-2008, 9% 1983-1992, which is what sets the realistic roof and rear-projection options. On roofs the borough is shallow gabled roofs typical of that period's building and trussed-rafter roofs typical of 2000s building, over late-1950s and early-1960s houses (13% of 3,150 homes), 2000s houses and apartments (12%) and 1980s estate houses (9%).
What is permitted in Four Marks & Medstead turns on designation first, so that is where we start: Chawton (conservation area designated in 1977). Inside those boundaries permitted development is curtailed and East Hampshire District Council assesses materials, window detail and roof form against the area's own appraisal, so a scheme that would be waved through two streets away can need a full application here.
Beyond the designated areas, Four Marks & Medstead takes in Four Marks, Chawton and Medstead. East Hampshire District Council has 50 recorded Article 4 directions — check the address before assuming PD applies in Four Marks & Medstead.
On stock, Four Marks & Medstead is late-1950s and early-1960s houses (13% of 3,150 homes), 2000s houses and apartments (12%) and 1980s estate houses (9%) — which is why shallow gabled roofs typical of that period's building and trussed-rafter roofs typical of 2000s building govern what a loft or rear projection can realistically be. East Hampshire District Council decided 327 householder applications in the latest published year and granted 91%, with 24% issued inside the eight-week target. We draw to that record rather than to a national average.
The full build-period split for Four Marks & Medstead runs pre-1900 3% (90 homes), 1900-1918 2% (70 homes), 1919-1929 2% (70 homes), 1930-1939 5% (170 homes), 1945-1954 4% (120 homes), 1955-1964 13% (400 homes), 1965-1972 9% (270 homes), 1973-1982 7% (210 homes), 1983-1992 9% (290 homes), 1993-1999 5% (170 homes) and 2000-2008 12% (370 homes). That distribution is why pre-1900 detailing dominates the drawings here, and it is measured from council-tax records rather than assumed from the street name.
East Hampshire District Council also decides for Alton Holybourne, Alton Whitedown, Bentworth & Froyle, Bramshott & Liphook, Buriton & East Meon, Headley, Horndean Catherington and Liss, so a decision in Four Marks & Medstead sits inside a wider pattern of decisions we track across the same authority — useful when an officer cites a precedent from the next area over.
The Article 4 directions recorded for this council include Ajax House/Plowden House, Liphook, Bedford Road, Petersfield, Bellhanger Enterprises, Bentworth and Bentley Business Park, Bentley. Each removes a specific permitted-development right inside its own boundary, which is why the check is done on the address rather than on the town.
Published figures for Four Marks & Medstead and East Hampshire District Council. These are the numbers that decide what is realistic on your street, so we work from them rather than from national averages.
| Measure | Four Marks & Medstead |
|---|---|
| Dwellings recorded | 3,150 |
| Built pre-1900 | 90 (3%) |
| Built 1900-1918 | 70 (2%) |
| Built 1919-1929 | 70 (2%) |
| Built 1930-1939 | 170 (5%) |
| Built 1945-1954 | 120 (4%) |
| Built 1955-1964 | 400 (13%) |
| Built 1965-1972 | 270 (9%) |
| Built 1973-1982 | 210 (7%) |
| Built 1983-1992 | 290 (9%) |
| Built 1993-1999 | 170 (5%) |
| Built 2000-2008 | 370 (12%) |
| Built before 1919 | 5% |
| Built 1919–1939 | 8% |
| Built 1945–2008 | 58% |
| Conservation areas in Four Marks & Medstead | 1 (Chawton) |
| Conservation areas district-wide | 50 |
| Article 4 directions recorded | 50 |
| Householder applications decided | 327 |
| Householder applications granted | 91% |
| Decided within 8 weeks | 24% |
Dwelling stock from VOA council-tax data at 31 March 2025; conservation-area and Article 4 counts from planning.data.gov.uk (MHCLG); decision figures are East Hampshire District Council's own, from MHCLG live table PS2 for the year to 31 March 2026.
Councils do not decide annexes on square metres. They decide whether, once built, the accommodation forms part of one planning unit with the main house or a second one beside it. East Hampshire District Council looks at whether the garden is shared or divided, whether the annexe has its own street access and address, whether the occupier could live there entirely independently, and whether the two households would function as one. That is the whole case, and it is made or lost on the layout.
Four Marks & Medstead is largely late-1950s and early-1960s houses (13% of 3,150 homes), 2000s houses and apartments (12%) and 1980s estate houses (9%), which shapes the realistic options: converting part of the existing house, extending it, or building a detached unit in the garden. A detached annexe can sometimes sit under Class E as an outbuilding incidental to the enjoyment of the dwellinghouse — but sleeping accommodation is generally not "incidental", so a garden annexe with a bedroom usually needs its own permission rather than relying on outbuilding rights.
In Four Marks & Medstead's conservation areas — including Chawton — a garden building is also judged on its effect on the character of the area, which limits height and footprint before the use question is reached. East Hampshire District Council has 50 recorded Article 4 directions — check the address before assuming PD applies in Four Marks & Medstead.
An annexe almost always needs an application to East Hampshire District Council. Expect one where any of these apply:
We plan the annexe so its relationship to the main house is visible on the page — shared garden, connected access, a layout that reads as one household — and set out the case East Hampshire District Council has to test, rather than leaving the officer to assume the worst.
Below is East Hampshire District Council's real householder decision record, drawn from official planning statistics and refreshed as new data lands. East Hampshire District Council granted 91% of its householder applications in the year to 31 March 2026, and Chawton shapes what is approved here. Annexe applications are decided on use as much as design, so the supporting case matters as much as the elevations.
Source: MHCLG planning application statistics (householder decisions, England, 1 April 2025 - 31 March 2026). Compare every borough on our London approval-rate league table.
Tell us about your project and get a fixed, no-obligation quote back within one working day. If you don't need planning permission at all, we'll tell you that too — for free.
Across Chawton, Four Marks and Chawton, the annexes that succeed keep one shared garden, take access past the main house rather than from the street, and are modest against the host building — single storey where the plot is overlooked, and set back from boundaries. On late-1950s and early-1960s houses (13% of 3,150 homes), converting an integral garage or a rear ground floor is often approved more readily than a detached garden unit, because the ancillary relationship is self-evident.
Four Marks & Medstead contains the Chawton conservation area (Chawton designated 1977), so materials, fenestration and roof form are assessed against the appraisal. Where East Hampshire District Council grants permission, it commonly attaches a condition tying occupation of the annexe to the main dwelling. That condition is not a problem to be avoided — it is usually the mechanism that makes approval possible, and we draft the application on that basis rather than pretending the annexe is something it is not.
We draw annexes across Four Marks & Medstead. A few of the areas where multigenerational schemes come up most often:
Annexe and granny-flat drawings for Chawton — conservation area designated in 1977 — planned to stay ancillary and drawn to East Hampshire District Council's policies.
Annexe and granny-flat drawings for Four Marks — civil parish within Four Marks & Medstead — planned to stay ancillary and drawn to East Hampshire District Council's policies.
Annexe and granny-flat drawings for Chawton — civil parish within Four Marks & Medstead — planned to stay ancillary and drawn to East Hampshire District Council's policies.
Annexe and granny-flat drawings for Medstead — civil parish within Four Marks & Medstead — planned to stay ancillary and drawn to East Hampshire District Council's policies.
Three similar buildings, three different consents. This is what separates them.
| What you build | Planning status | Key test | What East Hampshire District Council checks |
|---|---|---|---|
| Garden room, no sleeping space | Often Class E permitted development | Incidental to the house | Height, footprint, boundary position |
| Annexe used by the household | Full application, usually with a tie condition | Ancillary use | Shared garden and access, layout |
| Self-contained unit, own access | New dwelling — full application | Separate planning unit | Policy on new homes, amenity, parking |
| Converted garage or ground floor | Often permitted, use still assessed | Whether use changes | Independence of the accommodation |
| Annexe on designated land | Full application | Designation | Character and appearance |
The ancillary/separate-dwelling distinction comes from section 55 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990; outbuilding limits from the GPDO 2015, Schedule 2, Part 1, Class E.
A fixed process built around how East Hampshire District Council tests the use question as well as the design.
Tell us who the annexe is for and where it would sit on the plot. We confirm designation status and tell you honestly whether the scheme reads as ancillary or as a separate dwelling in Four Marks & Medstead.
We measure the plot, the existing house and the access route, so the shared-garden and shared-access case can be drawn rather than asserted.
Chartered designers develop the annexe to your brief, with the layout, access and garden relationship arranged to support the ancillary case under East Hampshire District Council's policies.
We submit the application with a supporting statement on use, manage validation and case-officer queries, and revise free until East Hampshire District Council decides.
Almost always. Sleeping accommodation is generally not "incidental" to the enjoyment of a house, so it falls outside the outbuilding permitted-development right, and any annexe that could function independently raises a change-of-use question under section 55. In Four Marks & Medstead we prepare a full application to East Hampshire District Council and make the ancillary case explicitly rather than hoping it is not asked.
A shared garden rather than a divided one, access through the main property rather than a separate street entrance, occupation by a member of the same household, and a physical and functional relationship with the main house. East Hampshire District Council weighs those together — no single feature decides it, but a separate front door and a fenced-off garden together usually settle it against you. This applies to your Four Marks & Medstead address specifically.
Yes, subject to permission. A detached garden annexe is assessed on its scale against the plot, its effect on neighbours and the character of the area, and then on the use question. Keeping it single storey, set in from boundaries and served off the shared garden gives it the best prospect in Four Marks & Medstead, particularly near designated areas such as Chawton. East Hampshire District Council is the decision-maker.
Commonly, yes — a condition tying occupation of the annexe to the main dwelling, so it cannot be sold or let separately. That is normally what makes approval possible, because it removes the concern that a new independent home is being created without going through housing policy. The condition runs with the land, so it matters at resale, and we explain the implications before you commit. This applies to your Four Marks & Medstead address specifically. East Hampshire District Council is the decision-maker.
Yes. A new annexe is new habitable accommodation, so structure, fire escape, insulation and ventilation all apply, and a detached annexe close to a boundary raises fire-spread requirements as well. Planning and building control are separate consents with separate submissions — we prepare both so the approved design is the one that can actually be built. This applies to your Four Marks & Medstead address specifically. East Hampshire District Council is the decision-maker.
A householder application runs to an eight-week statutory target; where the council treats the annexe as creating a new unit it becomes a minor application with a thirteen-week target instead. Which route applies depends on how the use is characterised, which is precisely why the ancillary case is worth making properly at the outset. This applies to your Four Marks & Medstead address specifically. East Hampshire District Council is the decision-maker.
We quote each Four Marks & Medstead annexe individually, because plot, access and whether you are converting or building new all change the work, and send a fixed, no-obligation quote within one working day. It covers the full drawing pack and supporting statement, with free revisions until East Hampshire District Council approves. Call 020 7864 7245 to start.
Answer five quick questions and get a free planning score for your exact address — instantly. Then, if you want the full picture, unlock the detailed analysis: your council's live approval rates, local precedents, constraints on your street and a step-by-step route to permission.
Same fixed quotes, same fast drawings — wherever your project is.